2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.17.024069
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Robust Autotuning of Noisy Quantum dot Devices

Abstract: The current autotuning approaches for quantum dot (QD) devices, while showing some success, lack an assessment of data reliability. This leads to unexpected failures when noisy or otherwise low quality data is processed by an autonomous system. In this work, we propose a framework for robust autotuning of QD devices that combines a machine learning (ML) state classifier with a data quality control module. The data quality control module acts as a "gatekeeper" system, ensuring that only reliable data is process… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of the score function is to identify scans showing double dot features by scoring them highly whilst scoring other features, such as those from single dots, poorly. Score functions used in the literature to evaluate current measurements have been based on neural networks [8,34,35], Hough transforms [7,36], custom fitting models [6], handcrafted heuristics [5], and even ray-based classification [37]. These score functions are too noise-sensitive for fast measurements or cannot generalise to complex signals.…”
Section: Score Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the score function is to identify scans showing double dot features by scoring them highly whilst scoring other features, such as those from single dots, poorly. Score functions used in the literature to evaluate current measurements have been based on neural networks [8,34,35], Hough transforms [7,36], custom fitting models [6], handcrafted heuristics [5], and even ray-based classification [37]. These score functions are too noise-sensitive for fast measurements or cannot generalise to complex signals.…”
Section: Score Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the score function is to identify scans showing double dot features by scoring them highly whilst scoring other features, such as those from single dots, poorly. Score functions used in the literature to evaluate current measurements have been based on neural networks [7,32,33], Hough transforms [6,34], custom fitting models [5], handcrafted heuristics [4], and even ray-based classification [35]. These score functions are too noise-sensitive for fast measurements or cannot generalise to complex signals.…”
Section: Score Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the shape and orientation of the lines encodes sufficient qualitative information about the state of the device to enable state (in this case, charge topology) classification. As shown in [31], a CNN-based classifier trained for state identification learns to mask the noise captured between transition lines in these 2D charge sensing images.…”
Section: Ray-based Classification Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%