2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.81.055503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward preciseQECvalues for the superallowed0+0+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This thickness was determined to be 53 ± 5 µg/cm 2 through the reanalysis of the data of a previous scattering experiment [36], where an 8-MeV 4 He + beam along with the Enge spectrograph at WNSL and a silicon surface barrier detector were used to determine the composition and thickness of the CdS target. The theoretical angular distributions of the cross sections were then computed via (i) Distorted Wave Born Approximation (DWBA) calculations using the one-step finite range transfer formalism for the natural-parity states, and (ii) [14].…”
Section: Results: Both Phases Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This thickness was determined to be 53 ± 5 µg/cm 2 through the reanalysis of the data of a previous scattering experiment [36], where an 8-MeV 4 He + beam along with the Enge spectrograph at WNSL and a silicon surface barrier detector were used to determine the composition and thickness of the CdS target. The theoretical angular distributions of the cross sections were then computed via (i) Distorted Wave Born Approximation (DWBA) calculations using the one-step finite range transfer formalism for the natural-parity states, and (ii) [14].…”
Section: Results: Both Phases Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A = 32, T = 2 quintet is currently the most precisely measured quintent. Here, a precise Penning trap measurement of 32 Si [11] led to an observed breakdown of the IMME, requiring a small, but very significant, cubic term d = 1.00(9) keV, which was supported by a measurement of the 32 Cl mass using the 32 S( 3 He,t) 32 Cl reaction [12]. A later precision measurement of the 31 S mass [13] led to an even greater precision on the 32 Cl mass excess and found that no combination of various literature values could produce a fit that validated the IMME for the A = 32, T = 2 quintet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The two most recent measurements [4,9] produced values that differed from each other systematically in the region of astrophysical interest by about 4 keV. The earlier measurement [3,9,10] carried a combined statistical and systematic uncertainty of ≈ 0.5 keV.…”
Section: CL Excitation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] are systematically low and that the systematic effect increases in magnitude with increasing excitation energy (this increase may saturate). Such an increase could result from the fact that the lowest excitation energies were strongly influenced by internal 32 Cl calibration points and that the calibration gradually became more dependent on external calibration points towards higher energies [4], introducing substantial systematic uncertainties from the dependence on the assumed target properties [3,9,10] (primarily) and reaction Q values [9] (secondarily).…”
Section: CL Excitation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%