2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1040911
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a possible trauma subtype of functional neurological disorder: impact on symptom severity and physical health

Abstract: BackgroundAs a group, individuals with functional neurological disorder (FND) report an approximately 3-fold increase in adverse life experiences (ALEs) compared to healthy controls. In patients with FND, studies have identified a positive correlation between symptom severity and the magnitude of ALEs. While not all individuals with FND report ALEs, such findings raise the possibility of a trauma-subtype of FND.ObjectiveThis study investigated if patients with FND, with or without probable post-traumatic stres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In prior work we included FS participants with neurologist/epileptologist-verified diagnoses based on careful assessment including video EEG ( 41 , 42 ); here, we chose to broaden our sample to FS individuals who may not have had access to epilepsy monitoring unit evaluation. Reasonable consistency between present findings and prior work, yet with some differences [e.g., fewer significant correlations between socioemotional processes and symptoms ( 49 )—which also may be due to measure limitations (single items assessing seizure frequency and severity) and small sample size], suggests that a community sample may provide important information, alongside systematic comparisons with diagnostically-verified samples. Such an approach could facilitate understanding FS as a continuum, perhaps with subclinical presentations and normed self-report measures to capture them, akin to studies of depression and other clinical syndromes [e.g., ( 89 , 90 )].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In prior work we included FS participants with neurologist/epileptologist-verified diagnoses based on careful assessment including video EEG ( 41 , 42 ); here, we chose to broaden our sample to FS individuals who may not have had access to epilepsy monitoring unit evaluation. Reasonable consistency between present findings and prior work, yet with some differences [e.g., fewer significant correlations between socioemotional processes and symptoms ( 49 )—which also may be due to measure limitations (single items assessing seizure frequency and severity) and small sample size], suggests that a community sample may provide important information, alongside systematic comparisons with diagnostically-verified samples. Such an approach could facilitate understanding FS as a continuum, perhaps with subclinical presentations and normed self-report measures to capture them, akin to studies of depression and other clinical syndromes [e.g., ( 89 , 90 )].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Future work with a lifespan approach is needed to better understand and inform symptom management for PwMS, especially work that expands upon the few studies investigating childhood adversity and pain (MacDonald et al., 2021), fatigue (Pust et al., 2020), and psychiatric comorbidity (Wan et al., 2022). Further, ACE research has been growing in many adjacent areas of symptom severity such as functional neurological disorder (Paredes‐Echeverri et al., 2023), Tourette's syndrome (Yang et al., 2022), frequent headaches (Anto et al., 2021), and Parkinson's disease (Subramanian et al., 2023). A lifespan approach may similarly increase nuance in these areas as well as MS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 While adverse life experiences, both proximal and remote, can be relevant predisposing vulnerabilities or acute precipitants in a subset of individuals with FND, such experiences are nonspecific and no longer diagnostically required. 20,21 The five main subtypes of FND include functional (psychogenic nonepileptic/dissociative) seizures, functional motor disorders (such as functional speech/ voice and functional limb weakness presentations), functional sensory deficits, persistent postural perceptual dizziness (a form of functional dizziness), and FCD. 22 For FCD, there are four diagnostic criteria: (1) one or more cognitive complaints, (2) clinical evidence of internal inconsistency, (3) symptoms or deficits lacking sufficient explanation 4) inconsistent patterns in neurocognitive testing (e.g., overt impairment in word registration yet relatively preserved delayed recall of words).…”
Section: Questions To the Consultantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than framed as a diagnosis of exclusion, FND is now a rule-in diagnosis based on examination signs and semiological features specific to the condition 18,19 . While adverse life experiences, both proximal and remote, can be relevant predisposing vulnerabilities or acute precipitants in a subset of individuals with FND, such experiences are nonspecific and no longer diagnostically required 20,21 . The five main subtypes of FND include functional (psychogenic nonepileptic/dissociative) seizures, functional motor disorders (such as functional speech/voice and functional limb weakness presentations), functional sensory deficits, persistent postural perceptual dizziness (a form of functional dizziness), and FCD 22 …”
Section: Questions To the Consultantsmentioning
confidence: 99%