2022
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001516
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Clearer Definition of Selection Bias When Estimating Causal Effects

Abstract: Selection bias remains a subject of controversy. Existing definitions of selection bias are ambiguous. To improve communication and the conduct of epidemiologic research focused on estimating causal effects, we propose to unify the various existing definitions of selection bias in the literature by considering any bias away from the true causal effect in the referent population (the population before the selection process), due to selecting the sample from the referent population, as selection bias. Given this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last but not least, this study is cross-sectional, and our study may suffer from selection bias. It can only determine the association between depression, anxiety, and potential risk factors ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, this study is cross-sectional, and our study may suffer from selection bias. It can only determine the association between depression, anxiety, and potential risk factors ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, although tobacco-speci c NNAL has a relatively long half-life compared with cotinine, it still only measures a person's recent exposure to tobacco and does not re ect long-term exposure to tobacco. In addition, the excluded people due to missing data (n = 112) and the included participants (n = 1,673) had ethnic, mental health, and lifestyle differences; therefore, selection bias may exist [33]. Last but not least, we may not have assessed all cognitive domains with only three cognitive tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the excluded people due to missing data and being current smokers (n = 769) and the included participants (n = 2703) had ethnic, mental health, and lifestyle differences. Therefore, selection bias is likely (Lu, Cole, Howe, & Westreich, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%