2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total sleep deprivation reduces top-down regulation of emotion without altering bottom-up affective processing

Abstract: Sleep loss is reported to influence affective processing, causing changes in overall mood and altering emotion regulation. These aspects of affective processing are seldom investigated together, making it difficult to determine whether total sleep deprivation has a global effect on how affective stimuli and emotions are processed, or whether specific components of affective processing are affected selectively. Sixty healthy adults were recruited for an in-laboratory study and, after a monitored night of sleep … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The so-called “task impurity problem” implies that any neurobehavioral task involves a number of interrelated cognitive processes that must be dissociable and distinguished to be able to interpret which, if any, of these processes are differentially affected by circadian rhythmicity [ 40 , 70 ]. Based on dissociations demonstrated in recent sleep deprivation studies, neurobehavioral (or cognitive) functions of particular interest for future studies may include attentional control [ 71 ], memory binding [ 72 ] and maintenance [ 73 ], and emotion regulation [ 74 ]. Referring to the sleep deprivation literature is relevant here, because our results indicate that the differences we observed in the overall temporal profiles of the KSS, DSST, and PVT with the circadian and homeostatic processes still intertwined ( Figure 3 ) are attributable at least in part to differences between neurobehavioral functions in the influence of time awake through the homeostatic process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called “task impurity problem” implies that any neurobehavioral task involves a number of interrelated cognitive processes that must be dissociable and distinguished to be able to interpret which, if any, of these processes are differentially affected by circadian rhythmicity [ 40 , 70 ]. Based on dissociations demonstrated in recent sleep deprivation studies, neurobehavioral (or cognitive) functions of particular interest for future studies may include attentional control [ 71 ], memory binding [ 72 ] and maintenance [ 73 ], and emotion regulation [ 74 ]. Referring to the sleep deprivation literature is relevant here, because our results indicate that the differences we observed in the overall temporal profiles of the KSS, DSST, and PVT with the circadian and homeostatic processes still intertwined ( Figure 3 ) are attributable at least in part to differences between neurobehavioral functions in the influence of time awake through the homeostatic process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be of interest to investigate whether TSD would alter EDA and experienced emotion responses to emotional induction stimuli (cf. Franzen et al, 2008;Stenson et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valence and arousal are deliberately intertwined on this instrument (Watson and Tellegen, 1985 ). The PANAS shows good internal consistency and construct validity (Watson et al, 1988 ; Crawford and Henry, 2004 ) and has been previously used to assess changes in self-reported mood during TSD (Franzen et al, 2008 ; Riedy et al, 2013 ; Stenson et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations