2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003948.pub3
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds

Abstract: There is weak evidence from one small trial that 6% miltefosine solution applied topically to people with superficial fungating breast lesions (smaller than 1cm) who have received either previous radiotherapy, surgery, hormonal therapy or chemotherapy for their breast cancer, may slow disease progression. There is also weak evidence to suggest that foam dressings containing silver may be effective in reducing malodour. There is insufficient evidence in this review to give a clear direction for practice with re… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
92
11
4
4

Citation Types

0
56
0
7

Year Published

Range
2006
2006
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
86
12
4
1

Relationship

0
103

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 103 publications

(63 citation statements)
references

References 25 publications

0
56
0
7
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The publication period of the included studies ranges from 1997 to 2024. The distribution of studies over these years is heterogeneous, with a marked increase in research interest over the past decade ( n = 21, 52.5%) ( 32–52 ). The highest number of eligible studies was published in 2019 ( 34 , 43 , 46 , 50 ), as illustrated in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of study design, most of the studies included were primary research ( n = 27, 67.5%), comprising case studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 33 , 48 , 52–57 ), observational studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 47 , 58 ), randomized controlled trials ( n = 4, 10%) ( 38 , 42 , 43 , 59 ), clinical trials ( n = 3, 7.5%) ( 49 , 60 , 61 ), mixed-methods research ( n = 2, 5%) ( 62 , 63 ), and validation studies ( n = 2, 5%) ( 46 , 64 ). Secondary research was less common ( n = 13, 32.5%), consisting primarily of systematic reviews ( n = 5, 12.5%) ( 32 , 40 , 45 , 50 , 65 ) and other literature reviews ( n = 8, 20%) ( 35 , 51 , 66–71 ).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographically, the included studies originated from 13 countries in six macro-regions: Europe ( n = 16, 40%) ( 32 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 53–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 67–69 , 71 ), East Asia ( n = 9, 22.5%) ( 43 , 47–49 , 51 , 52 , 58 , 61 , 63 ), North America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 36 , 41 , 46 , 64 , 66 , 70 ), South America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 33–35 , 37 , 38 , 65 ), the Pacific ( n = 2, 5%) ( 42 , 50 ), and South Asia ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 44 ). As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations