2014
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds
Abstract: There is weak evidence from one small trial that 6% miltefosine solution applied topically to people with superficial fungating breast lesions (smaller than 1cm) who have received either previous radiotherapy, surgery, hormonal therapy or chemotherapy for their breast cancer, may slow disease progression. There is also weak evidence to suggest that foam dressings containing silver may be effective in reducing malodour. There is insufficient evidence in this review to give a clear direction for practice with re… Show more
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
92
11
4
4
Citation Types
0
56
0
7
Year Published
Range
2006
20062026
2026Publication Types
Select...
86
12
4
1
Relationship
0
103
Authors
Journals
Cited by 103 publications
(63 citation statements)
References 25 publications
0
56
0
7
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The publication period of the included studies ranges from 1997 to 2024. The distribution of studies over these years is heterogeneous, with a marked increase in research interest over the past decade ( n = 21, 52.5%) ( 32–52 ). The highest number of eligible studies was published in 2019 ( 34 , 43 , 46 , 50 ), as illustrated in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of study design, most of the studies included were primary research ( n = 27, 67.5%), comprising case studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 33 , 48 , 52–57 ), observational studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 47 , 58 ), randomized controlled trials ( n = 4, 10%) ( 38 , 42 , 43 , 59 ), clinical trials ( n = 3, 7.5%) ( 49 , 60 , 61 ), mixed-methods research ( n = 2, 5%) ( 62 , 63 ), and validation studies ( n = 2, 5%) ( 46 , 64 ). Secondary research was less common ( n = 13, 32.5%), consisting primarily of systematic reviews ( n = 5, 12.5%) ( 32 , 40 , 45 , 50 , 65 ) and other literature reviews ( n = 8, 20%) ( 35 , 51 , 66–71 ).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographically, the included studies originated from 13 countries in six macro-regions: Europe ( n = 16, 40%) ( 32 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 53–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 67–69 , 71 ), East Asia ( n = 9, 22.5%) ( 43 , 47–49 , 51 , 52 , 58 , 61 , 63 ), North America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 36 , 41 , 46 , 64 , 66 , 70 ), South America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 33–35 , 37 , 38 , 65 ), the Pacific ( n = 2, 5%) ( 42 , 50 ), and South Asia ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 44 ). As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The publication period of the included studies ranges from 1997 to 2024. The distribution of studies over these years is heterogeneous, with a marked increase in research interest over the past decade ( n = 21, 52.5%) ( 32–52 ). The highest number of eligible studies was published in 2019 ( 34 , 43 , 46 , 50 ), as illustrated in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of study design, most of the studies included were primary research ( n = 27, 67.5%), comprising case studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 33 , 48 , 52–57 ), observational studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 47 , 58 ), randomized controlled trials ( n = 4, 10%) ( 38 , 42 , 43 , 59 ), clinical trials ( n = 3, 7.5%) ( 49 , 60 , 61 ), mixed-methods research ( n = 2, 5%) ( 62 , 63 ), and validation studies ( n = 2, 5%) ( 46 , 64 ). Secondary research was less common ( n = 13, 32.5%), consisting primarily of systematic reviews ( n = 5, 12.5%) ( 32 , 40 , 45 , 50 , 65 ) and other literature reviews ( n = 8, 20%) ( 35 , 51 , 66–71 ).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographically, the included studies originated from 13 countries in six macro-regions: Europe ( n = 16, 40%) ( 32 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 53–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 67–69 , 71 ), East Asia ( n = 9, 22.5%) ( 43 , 47–49 , 51 , 52 , 58 , 61 , 63 ), North America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 36 , 41 , 46 , 64 , 66 , 70 ), South America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 33–35 , 37 , 38 , 65 ), the Pacific ( n = 2, 5%) ( 42 , 50 ), and South Asia ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 44 ). As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Most focused on local therapies (dressings), used with or without systemic interventions such as antibiotics. Three studies were case studies32–35 and 3 were reports of original research evaluating the effects of topical or systematic therapies on pain, malodor, exudate, and bleeding 7,36–42…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The publication period of the included studies ranges from 1997 to 2024. The distribution of studies over these years is heterogeneous, with a marked increase in research interest over the past decade ( n = 21, 52.5%) ( 32–52 ). The highest number of eligible studies was published in 2019 ( 34 , 43 , 46 , 50 ), as illustrated in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of study design, most of the studies included were primary research ( n = 27, 67.5%), comprising case studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 33 , 48 , 52–57 ), observational studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 47 , 58 ), randomized controlled trials ( n = 4, 10%) ( 38 , 42 , 43 , 59 ), clinical trials ( n = 3, 7.5%) ( 49 , 60 , 61 ), mixed-methods research ( n = 2, 5%) ( 62 , 63 ), and validation studies ( n = 2, 5%) ( 46 , 64 ). Secondary research was less common ( n = 13, 32.5%), consisting primarily of systematic reviews ( n = 5, 12.5%) ( 32 , 40 , 45 , 50 , 65 ) and other literature reviews ( n = 8, 20%) ( 35 , 51 , 66–71 ).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographically, the included studies originated from 13 countries in six macro-regions: Europe ( n = 16, 40%) ( 32 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 53–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 67–69 , 71 ), East Asia ( n = 9, 22.5%) ( 43 , 47–49 , 51 , 52 , 58 , 61 , 63 ), North America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 36 , 41 , 46 , 64 , 66 , 70 ), South America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 33–35 , 37 , 38 , 65 ), the Pacific ( n = 2, 5%) ( 42 , 50 ), and South Asia ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 44 ). As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Most focused on local therapies (dressings), used with or without systemic interventions such as antibiotics. Three studies were case studies32–35 and 3 were reports of original research evaluating the effects of topical or systematic therapies on pain, malodor, exudate, and bleeding 7,36–42…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The publication period of the included studies ranges from 1997 to 2024. The distribution of studies over these years is heterogeneous, with a marked increase in research interest over the past decade ( n = 21, 52.5%) ( 32–52 ). The highest number of eligible studies was published in 2019 ( 34 , 43 , 46 , 50 ), as illustrated in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of study design, most of the studies included were primary research ( n = 27, 67.5%), comprising case studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 33 , 48 , 52–57 ), observational studies ( n = 8, 20%) ( 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 47 , 58 ), randomized controlled trials ( n = 4, 10%) ( 38 , 42 , 43 , 59 ), clinical trials ( n = 3, 7.5%) ( 49 , 60 , 61 ), mixed-methods research ( n = 2, 5%) ( 62 , 63 ), and validation studies ( n = 2, 5%) ( 46 , 64 ). Secondary research was less common ( n = 13, 32.5%), consisting primarily of systematic reviews ( n = 5, 12.5%) ( 32 , 40 , 45 , 50 , 65 ) and other literature reviews ( n = 8, 20%) ( 35 , 51 , 66–71 ).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographically, the included studies originated from 13 countries in six macro-regions: Europe ( n = 16, 40%) ( 32 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 53–57 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 67–69 , 71 ), East Asia ( n = 9, 22.5%) ( 43 , 47–49 , 51 , 52 , 58 , 61 , 63 ), North America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 36 , 41 , 46 , 64 , 66 , 70 ), South America ( n = 6, 15%) ( 33–35 , 37 , 38 , 65 ), the Pacific ( n = 2, 5%) ( 42 , 50 ), and South Asia ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 44 ). As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 , the United Kingdom contributed the largest number of eligible studies ( n = 12, 30%) ( 32 , 45 , 53–57 , 60 , 67–69 , 71 ). Most of the included articles were published in English ( n = 37, 92.5%) ( 32 , 36–46 , 53–62 , 64–70 ), followed by Portuguese ( n = 2, 5%) ( 33 , 34 ), while one record ( n = 1, 2.5%) ( 35 ) appeared in both languages.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Most focused on local therapies (dressings), used with or without systemic interventions such as antibiotics. Three studies were case studies32–35 and 3 were reports of original research evaluating the effects of topical or systematic therapies on pain, malodor, exudate, and bleeding 7,36–42…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%