2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top–down fabrication of sub-nanometre semiconducting nanoribbons derived from molybdenum disulfide sheets

Abstract: Developments in semiconductor technology are propelling the dimensions of devices down to 10 nm, but facing great challenges in manufacture at the sub-10 nm scale. Nanotechnology can fabricate nanoribbons from two-dimensional atomic crystals, such as graphene, with widths below the 10 nm threshold, but their geometries and properties have been hard to control at this scale. Here we find that robust ultrafine molybdenum-sulfide ribbons with a uniform width of 0.35 nm can be widely formed between holes created i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
174
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
174
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two typical methods to prepare MoS 2 : top‐down and bottom‐up. A top‐down method starts from bulk MoS 2 crystals as the raw material, and the bulk MoS 2 crystals can be easily exfoliated to atomically thin layers via mechanical cleavage, high‐energy sonication, and liquid exfoliation or chemical intercalation‐exfoliation methods based on the special feature of MoS 2 (interlayer contacted via the weak van der Waals force) 36, 37, 38, 39. The bottom‐up method can be divided into two approaches: 1) chemical vapor deposition (two‐step thermolysis using ammonium thiomolybdeates or molybodenum trioxide as the precursor followed by sulfidation with sulfur) method with the features of high quality, controllable thickness, and compatible substrates; and 2) wet‐chemical synthesis including hydrothermal and solvothermal ((NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 ·4H 2 O and thiourea have been utilized as the precursors), showing relative lower crystal quality yet abundant active sites and easy to form morphologies with various substrates (such as hollow carbon spheres, carbon nanotube/nanofibers, amorphous carbon/conductive polymer coatings, graphene films, and CMK‐3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two typical methods to prepare MoS 2 : top‐down and bottom‐up. A top‐down method starts from bulk MoS 2 crystals as the raw material, and the bulk MoS 2 crystals can be easily exfoliated to atomically thin layers via mechanical cleavage, high‐energy sonication, and liquid exfoliation or chemical intercalation‐exfoliation methods based on the special feature of MoS 2 (interlayer contacted via the weak van der Waals force) 36, 37, 38, 39. The bottom‐up method can be divided into two approaches: 1) chemical vapor deposition (two‐step thermolysis using ammonium thiomolybdeates or molybodenum trioxide as the precursor followed by sulfidation with sulfur) method with the features of high quality, controllable thickness, and compatible substrates; and 2) wet‐chemical synthesis including hydrothermal and solvothermal ((NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 ·4H 2 O and thiourea have been utilized as the precursors), showing relative lower crystal quality yet abundant active sites and easy to form morphologies with various substrates (such as hollow carbon spheres, carbon nanotube/nanofibers, amorphous carbon/conductive polymer coatings, graphene films, and CMK‐3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12). We use our MoS 2 nanopore generator to power a MoS 2 transistor, thus demonstrating a self-powered nanosystem.MoS 2 nanopores have already demonstrated better water-transport behaviour than graphene 13,14 owing to the enriched hydrophilic surface sites (provided by the molybdenum) that are produced following either irradiation with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 15 or electrochemical oxidation 16 . The osmotic power is generated by separating two reservoirs containing potassium chloride (KCl) solutions of different concentrations with a freestanding MoS 2 membrane, into which a single nanopore has been introduced 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MoS 2 nanopores are of particular interest as they can be used for extended periods of time (hours, and even days) without the need for any additional functionalization 18 . The sticking of DNA to MoS 2 nanopores is reduced by the Mo-rich region around the drilled pore after irradiation with a transmission electron microcope (TEM) 21 , and their stability can be attributed to their relative thickness (single-layer MoS 2 has a thickness of 0.7 nm). Single-layer MoS 2 also has a direct bandgap of at least 1.8 eV (refs 4, 22), a feature that is essential for electronic base detection with field-effect transistors (FETs) 4,23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group has recently shown that a silicon nitride nanopore can be integrated with a graphene nanoribbon transistor, and the translocation of DNA can be simultaneously detected using ionic currents and electrical currents 4 . However, pristine graphene nanopores exhibit strong hydrophobic interactions with DNA 15 , which limits their long-term use because of clogging, so surface functionalization of the graphene is required 16 .Other two-dimensional materials such as boron nitride (BN 21 , and their stability can be attributed to their relative thickness (single-layer MoS 2 has a thickness of 0.7 nm). Single-layer MoS 2 also has a direct bandgap of at least 1.8 eV (refs 4, 22), a feature that is essential for electronic base detection with field-effect transistors (FETs) 4,23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation