2016
DOI: 10.3390/technologies5010003
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Abstract:The current paper aims to review tooling life span, failure modes and models in cold microforming processes. As there is nearly no information available on tool-life for microforming the starting point was conventional cold forming. In cold forming common failures are (1) over stressing of the tool; (2) abrasive wear; (3) galling or adhesive wear, and (4) fatigue failure. The large variation in tool life observed in production and how to predict this was reviewed as this is important to the viability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy balance provided by the drive-wheel exceeds the energy needed to deform the material and counteract frictional losses and the energy absorbed by the press frame. In this sense, a proper selection of the forging energy for each configuration will avoid overloads and tool wear that will reduce the lifespan of the press [22]. An excessive energy could promote formation of flash, deformation of the dies or hammer, excessive bouncing of the bundle and early fracture of different components of the press.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy balance provided by the drive-wheel exceeds the energy needed to deform the material and counteract frictional losses and the energy absorbed by the press frame. In this sense, a proper selection of the forging energy for each configuration will avoid overloads and tool wear that will reduce the lifespan of the press [22]. An excessive energy could promote formation of flash, deformation of the dies or hammer, excessive bouncing of the bundle and early fracture of different components of the press.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding this parameter to the acceptable wear depth and the node threshold, a more easily comprehensible wear volume can be calculated to determine the end of tool life. Following the argumentation of Jafors et al [ 25 ], the tool life of a single die must always be considered as a single data point which is subject to strong fluctuations in the industrial manufacturing process [ 28 ]. Against this background, the calculated tool life represents a statistical mean value which can only be compared to a statistical evaluation of the lifetime over a longer period of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since for each process cycle, a calculation loop is performed at each node as shown in Figure 6 , the calculation of the lifetime of forging tools, which in reality can reach typical lifetimes of around 10,000 parts [ 25 ], quickly leads to a significant increase of the calculation time. For this reason, a cycle time-scaling, which is comparable to known techniques like mass- and time-scaling [ 26 ], is implemented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large scale production of forgings until today severely do suffer under unavoidable wear and structural damage due to extreme hot forging process conditions such as high cyclical mechanical as well as thermo-mechanical load applied onto active surface of forging tool. Subsequently the service life of the tools in hot forging is typically subjected to significant fluctuations [76] as depicted in Fig. 5.…”
Section: Tool Life Prediction In Hot Forging Determined By Digital Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%