2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool-use in a blended undergraduate course: In Search of user profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most commonly, these analyses and their findings are used to identify groups of students with low or insufficient levels of engagement that may adversely impact their overall academic performance. For instance, Lust and colleagues (Lust et al, 2013b;Lust, Vandewaetere, Ceulemans, Elen, & Clarebout, 2011) identified different students' strategies related to the use of various learning tools available within a learning management system (e.g., video recorded lectures and practice quizzes). In particular, based on the identified strategies, Lust et al (2013b) recognised four groups of students: no-users, intensive users, selective users, and limited users.…”
Section: Engagement With Course Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most commonly, these analyses and their findings are used to identify groups of students with low or insufficient levels of engagement that may adversely impact their overall academic performance. For instance, Lust and colleagues (Lust et al, 2013b;Lust, Vandewaetere, Ceulemans, Elen, & Clarebout, 2011) identified different students' strategies related to the use of various learning tools available within a learning management system (e.g., video recorded lectures and practice quizzes). In particular, based on the identified strategies, Lust et al (2013b) recognised four groups of students: no-users, intensive users, selective users, and limited users.…”
Section: Engagement With Course Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The label for this strategy is based largely on get it done approach users (del Valle & Duffy, 2009), selective users who used technology strategically and were goal-oriented (Lust et al, 2011), or dominators who demonstrated focus and were goal-oriented (Cleave, Edelson, & Beckwith, 1993).…”
Section: Module-level Learning Strategies -Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are also consistent with the results of previous studies (Hou, Chang & Sung, 2010;Wang, Li, Feng, Jiang, & Liu, 2012;Lonn, Aguilar, & Teasley, 2015), which found that students' participative behaviors can be promoted through the proposed social community-based learning method. Moreover, students do computer programming assignments more often than other computer programming IDE tools (Lust, Vandewaetere, Ceulemans, Elen, & Clarebout, 2011;Wang, Li, Feng, Jiang, & Liu, 2012;Lonn, Aguilar, & Teasley, 2015). Students can post messages in the Facebook discussion.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before using the clustering method, four variables are transformed in order to reduce the bias in the proposed learning analytics method (Lust, Vandewaetere, Ceulemans, Elen, & Clarebout, 2011).…”
Section: The Differences In Participative Behaviors and Learning Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%