‘Tool port’ to ‘landlord port’: a game theory approach to analyse gains from governance model transformation

Abstract

This study investigates potential port users' surplus and terminal operators' profits due to transforming port governance from the 'tool port' model to the 'landlord port' model. Although the landlord port model is one of the most adopted and successful port governance models, many ports still operate under other models. Chittagong Port, the largest port in Bangladesh, currently operates under the tool port model, while the country's second-largest port, Mongla Port, operates under the service port model. Chittagong Port is currently facing many challenges, including capacity expansion and renovation of port facilities. Therefore, we form four hypothetical situations for port governance model transformation, assuming that Chittagong Port will transform to the landlord port model but that Mongla Port will run under the existing governance model. Estimating a Bertrand game model, we present a cost-benefit analysis for port users and terminal operators (or port authorities) in hypothetical game situations. The results reveal that privatising one of the container terminals under a landlord setting is the most profitable scenario for Chittagong Port Authority, but privatising all terminals of Chittagong Port yields the highest users' surplus. However, privatising two of the terminals while they cooperate yields the lowest users' surplus.

The Role of Port Authority in Port Governance and Port Community System Implementation

“…Except for the public service port model, private firms participate in port operation with varying degrees of involvement. In that case, concession contracts play a key role as a port governance tool [49].…”

The Impact of Teamwork on an Organization’s Performance: A Cooperative Game’s Approach

“…Many of the national, regional, and even international disputes in which conflicts may result in imposing heavy costs on parties can be pursued through a cooperative game's model to reduce the costs. Allocation of public goods, exploitation of water resources, exploitation of oil wells, allocation of environmental costs, stock exchanges, commercial agreements, and international relations are examples of cases where the allocations of costs and benefits between players through cooperative game theory are much easier [26,27]. A cooperative game is one of the fairest ways upon which one can address allocating costs, incomes, wages, overtime amounts, and rewards by complying with the three principles of productivity, justice, and sustainability.…”

Actualización del marco estratégico para el sistema portuario español empleando un análisis DAFO

“…In Spain, the degree of private sector intervention in the provision of services has become very high. Companies take over the provision of so-called port services (pilotage, towing, mooring, cargo handling, passenger handling, waste collection from ships) and commercial services related to all kinds of industrial or service activities carried out in the public port domain (Munim, Saeed, and Larsen, 2019)…”