2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To heat or not to heat: Challenges with clinical translation of thermosensitive liposomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Thermoresponsive drug delivery systems (TDDS) are sensitive to higher temperature (39°C-45°C) and release payload at target sites, ie, hyperthermic body tissues. 2 However, synthesis of the thermoresponsive hydrogels and liposomes generally involves synthesis of block copolymers via complex chemical reactions and use of potentially toxic reagents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 Thermoresponsive drug delivery systems (TDDS) are sensitive to higher temperature (39°C-45°C) and release payload at target sites, ie, hyperthermic body tissues. 2 However, synthesis of the thermoresponsive hydrogels and liposomes generally involves synthesis of block copolymers via complex chemical reactions and use of potentially toxic reagents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ThermoDox ® has short circulation life and should be administered immediately before radiofrequency ablation. 1 Many embodiments of thermoresponsive liposomes show low encapsulation efficiency (EE) 6 and unpredictable drug release, 3,7 and their blood circulation life is very short. 1,8 On the other hand, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) have been reported to show long circulation life (24 hours) and passively target cancers by enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[66] One stimuli-responsive nanomedicine to reach the advanced clinical stage is the thermosensitive lyso-liposomal formualtion (Thermodox) encapsulating doxorubicin and releasing the drug upon heating to 40−45 °C due to the structural changes (pore formation) in the liposomes. [121] Despite of this advanced stimuli-responsive nanomedicine, the majority of the nanomedicines are regarded to slowly release the drugs in the systemic circulation, as a result of the long circulating time and slow extravasation, which most likely lead to a lower drug concentration when they reach the tumor and associated tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, given that recent analysis showed only about 0.7% of the injected dose of nanomedicines actually accumulate in the tumors, suggesting that less amount of nanomedicines reaching the tumor site may further reduce the drug dose at the tumor.…”
Section: Controlled Drug Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These technologies may use nano-or micro-scale drug carriers that release a drug after ultrasound raises the in situ temperature, 8,9 activates a 'sonosensitizer', 10 or applies a sufficient peak intensity or pressure 5,11 . While high-intensity continuous wave ultrasound (for temperature-gated systems) may be difficult to achieve stably in certain regions of the body, 12 raising the peak pressure or intensity necessitates only short bursts of ultrasound that are more straightforward to achieve in situ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%