2017
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To call a cloud ‘cirrus’: sound symbolism in names for categories or items

Abstract: The aim of the present paper is to experimentally test whether sound symbolism has selective effects on labels with different ranges-of-reference within a simple noun-hierarchy. In two experiments, adult participants learned the make up of two categories of unfamiliar objects (‘alien life forms’), and were passively exposed to either category-labels or item-labels, in a learning-by-guessing categorization task. Following category training, participants were tested on their visual discrimination of object pairs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grouping of phonemes into words was done to maximize the difference in sonority (low sonority ketsi, high sonority ubom) to further maximize the perception of difference between the words. Note that these two words align with known patterns of sound-symbolic congruence in Serbian (Ković, Sučević & Styles, 2017)…”
Section: Materials and Stimulisupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The grouping of phonemes into words was done to maximize the difference in sonority (low sonority ketsi, high sonority ubom) to further maximize the perception of difference between the words. Note that these two words align with known patterns of sound-symbolic congruence in Serbian (Ković, Sučević & Styles, 2017)…”
Section: Materials and Stimulisupporting
confidence: 63%
“…category learning), while arbitrariness allows further fine-grained differentiation between similar items (i.e. item learning), an effect which has been experimentally demonstrated by Ković et al [ 80 ]. Hence, if a single iconic feature (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%