2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To be or not to be conspicuous: the effects of prey availability and predator risk on spider's web decoration building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear stabilimenta in webs constructed by C. argenteoalba increase both in number (not significantly) and length (significantly) after webs are exposed to simulated predatory insect flutter, by means of a tuning fork, but this increase is not related to prey availability, suggesting that the stabilimenta have a predator defence function (Nakata, 2009). However, it is unclear whether this acts as camouflage or advertisement, or what the target predator is.…”
Section: Web Decorations In Orb Web Spidersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Linear stabilimenta in webs constructed by C. argenteoalba increase both in number (not significantly) and length (significantly) after webs are exposed to simulated predatory insect flutter, by means of a tuning fork, but this increase is not related to prey availability, suggesting that the stabilimenta have a predator defence function (Nakata, 2009). However, it is unclear whether this acts as camouflage or advertisement, or what the target predator is.…”
Section: Web Decorations In Orb Web Spidersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Orb-web architecture appears to be dichotomously plastic [i.e. appears as one of two forms (Whitman and Agrawal 2009)], and switching phenotype is induced by large-scale alterations in feeding frequency or prey retention (Nakata, 2007;Nakata, 2009). Orb-web architecture, accordingly, impacts on, and is responsive to, the physiology of the spider and the spider's niche breadth (Lehmann, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the capture area, web shape, symmetry, number of capture threads, mesh size (the distance between capture threads), the number of radial threads, the size and shape of decorations and silk properties may respond differently to various biotic and abiotic stimuli (Schneider and Vollrath, 1998;Heiling and Herberstein, 2000;Tso et al, 2005;Tso et al, 2007;Mayntz et al, 2009). Secondly, the nature of the stimuli inducing plasticity is multitudinous with prey type, prey abundance, prey nutrients, temperature, water availability, habitat complexity, predation pressure and web vibrations implicit in inducing plastic responses in orb spider webs (Vollrath et al, 1997;Herberstein et al, 2000a;Tso et al, 2005;Tso et al, 2007;Blamires et al, 2009;Nakata, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size and web characteristic spiders are important predictors of the size and type of prey the spider will capture [11] along with their capture efficiency [12][13][14][15][16]. Several factors reported to affect an orbweb-weavers ability to intercept prey, including insect availability [12,17], web area [14], web orientation [16] and web locations [18]. Prokop and Gryglakova [14] reported that web design including mesh height, capture thread length, and web area were affected by web height in wasplike spiders Argiope bruennichi (Araneae).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%