2018
DOI: 10.1101/372755
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TISMorph: A tool to quantify texture, irregularity and spreading of single cells

Abstract: Summary statement 13We develop a set of quantitative measures for studying changes in the shape and 14 We find that even though specific classification tasks often rely on a few measures, these 26 are not the same between all classification tasks, thus requiring the use of the entire suite 27 of measures for classification and discrimination. We provide detailed descriptions of the 28 measures, as well as codes to implement them. Image based quantitative analysis has the 29 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sum average Haralick texture feature was discarded due to normalization concerns. (ii) Shape features (15 features) were calculated as the absolute value of the frequency coefficients of the Fourier transform of the distance to the boundary as a function of the radial angle around cell center 92 , with the sum of shape features normalized to 1. (iii) The cell environment was featurized in a similar fashion, where an indicator function with value 0 if the cell boundary was in contact with the background mask (no neighboring cell), and value 1 if in contact with the cell foreground mask.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum average Haralick texture feature was discarded due to normalization concerns. (ii) Shape features (15 features) were calculated as the absolute value of the frequency coefficients of the Fourier transform of the distance to the boundary as a function of the radial angle around cell center 92 , with the sum of shape features normalized to 1. (iii) The cell environment was featurized in a similar fashion, where an indicator function with value 0 if the cell boundary was in contact with the background mask (no neighboring cell), and value 1 if in contact with the cell foreground mask.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell shape image dataset: The cell shape dataset contains mouse osteosarcoma 2D imaged cells [12], that were processed into a 100×2 vector of coordinates that define the cell shape contour, used as a test dataset in the Python package Geomstats [13] (for more details, see also [14] and the associated Github link). We more specifically considered the subset of "DUNN" cells (that denotes a specific lineage) from the control group (no treatment on the cells), which yields 207 cells in total.…”
Section: Synthetic Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next four features represented the mean and standard deviation of the minimal distance from the object's boundary points to the nearest neighboring object and the mean and standard deviation of the intensity values of pixels within each object. The next 30 features were computed as Fourier modes on the boundary coordinates as described in Alizadeh et al (2019). Such truncated Fourier decomposition approximates the object's shape with a smooth contour.…”
Section: Image Processing and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%