2009
DOI: 10.1086/595759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timescale Hierarchy Determines the Indirect Effects of Fluctuating Subsidy Inputs on In Situ Resources

Abstract: Empirical studies have shown that temporally fluctuating inputs of resource subsidies can indirectly increase or decrease the abundance of in situ resources by affecting generalist consumers that feed on both subsidies and in situ resources. By mathematical modeling, we develop a theoretical framework that can explain these variable consumer-mediated indirect effects. We show that the hierarchy of timescales among fluctuations in the subsidy input rate and consumers' reproductive and aggregative numerical resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These allochthonous resources, or resource subsidies, can strongly affect the abundance and space use of consumers in recipient ecosystems, with cascading effects on in situ resources [28,30,38,50,53]. However, the impact of resource subsidies on recipient communities can be affected by several factors, including the productivity of the donor and recipient habitats, amount of input, trophic level receiving the input, and temporal variability in subsidy input rates [29,37,55,58]. Not only the magnitude, but the direction of the indirect effect on in situ resources can vary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These allochthonous resources, or resource subsidies, can strongly affect the abundance and space use of consumers in recipient ecosystems, with cascading effects on in situ resources [28,30,38,50,53]. However, the impact of resource subsidies on recipient communities can be affected by several factors, including the productivity of the donor and recipient habitats, amount of input, trophic level receiving the input, and temporal variability in subsidy input rates [29,37,55,58]. Not only the magnitude, but the direction of the indirect effect on in situ resources can vary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of subsidy availability in part of a habitat can result in mixed (i.e. positive and negative) indirect effects on an in situ resource that occurs throughout the habitat [58]. Allochthonous inputs can also have striking effects on larger food webs [13,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…caves, headwater streams, and some small marine islands) can become unstable due to the increase in predator numbers [38,40]. The duration and magnitude of resource subsidy flux pulse, together with generation times and biomass of consumers and predators of those consumers, can determine community stability and possible dynamics [41][42][43].…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the reduced benthos resulted in markedly reduced insect emergence, a predictable decline in tetragnathid spider abundance, and a trophic cascade that increased biomass of streambed algae (Baxter et al 2004). These different forms of indirect effects, depending on whether predators are enclosed or free to move, fostered new ecological theory and modeling to incorporate these important elements of complexity in real food webs (Takimoto et al 2002(Takimoto et al , 2009). This feedback whereby empirical research does not simply respond by testing ecological theory, but indeed directs its development, is exactly the boundary that Gary Polis (1991) had proposed needed to be crossed.…”
Section: Linkages Between Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems In Foresmentioning
confidence: 99%