2014
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Dependent Changes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Visible Mesh Implants in Patients

Abstract: In this study, significant mesh shrinkage (20.9%) but marginal changes in local mesh configuration occurred within 90 days after mesh implantation. Centroid shift of the mesh implant can be traced back to different patient positioning and abdominal distension. The developed algorithm facilitates noninvasive assessment of key figures regarding MRI-visible meshes. Consequently, it might help to improve mesh technology as well as surgical skills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We describe a promising and innovative way of treatment that-based on our experience with the 3-D funnel mesh implant-appears to provide great benefits for both prevention and treatment of PSH compared with other commonly performed procedures [13]. Ciritsis et al [17] have reported a significant mesh shrinkage of 20.9 % occurring within 90 days after ironloaded PVDF mesh implantation in inguinal hernia surgery. In terms of size of the mesh, surgeons may have to distinguish prevention and treatment of PSH independently of standard mesh sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We describe a promising and innovative way of treatment that-based on our experience with the 3-D funnel mesh implant-appears to provide great benefits for both prevention and treatment of PSH compared with other commonly performed procedures [13]. Ciritsis et al [17] have reported a significant mesh shrinkage of 20.9 % occurring within 90 days after ironloaded PVDF mesh implantation in inguinal hernia surgery. In terms of size of the mesh, surgeons may have to distinguish prevention and treatment of PSH independently of standard mesh sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In both pressure conditions (0 and 15 mmHg), the signal voids induced by the iron‐loaded mesh's susceptibility differences were used to generate polygonal surface models of the mesh implants as described previously . On the obtained polygonal surface models using dedicated software (Geomagic Studio 2012.1.0; Geomagic, Morrisville, NC), the overall surface area, the length and the elongation in longitudinal and transverse directions of the meshes were assessed for both pressure conditions (0; 15 mmHg).Whereby the longitudinal and transverse directions of the animal agreed with the previously in vitro defined longitudinal and transverse directions of the meshes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both settings, of course, yield a high level of selection bias. This changed with the introduction of mesh implants loaded with iron particles that have proven to be visible in cross section imaging in various previous studies [1][2][3]. All of these aimed to evaluate presentability and postoperative changes in mesh size and surface area after implantation in either laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)-, retromuscular sublay-, or infra diaphragmatic onlay (for hiatal hernia augmentation)-position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these aimed to evaluate presentability and postoperative changes in mesh size and surface area after implantation in either laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)-, retromuscular sublay-, or infra diaphragmatic onlay (for hiatal hernia augmentation)-position. Two studies [1,3] focused on inguinal hernias. All trials to date include a limited number of patients and evaluate in vivo mesh behavior in very different anatomical positions [1,[3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%