2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three Mandarin Chinese recognition tasks were tested, i.e., time-compression threshold, sentence in noise recognition, sentence in reverberation recognition. The results for the four tasks with the two vocoders in these NH participants were compared with actual CI results from the first author’s previous experiments (Meng et al ., 2019) as well as some newly collected data in this work. These experiments were conducted following procedures approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shenzhen University, China.…”
Section: Vocoders and Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three Mandarin Chinese recognition tasks were tested, i.e., time-compression threshold, sentence in noise recognition, sentence in reverberation recognition. The results for the four tasks with the two vocoders in these NH participants were compared with actual CI results from the first author’s previous experiments (Meng et al ., 2019) as well as some newly collected data in this work. These experiments were conducted following procedures approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shenzhen University, China.…”
Section: Vocoders and Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in speech-shaped noise (SSN) and babble noise, i.e., signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which 50% of words could be recognized correctly, were measured using the Mandarin hearing in noise test (MHINT) corpus (Wong et al ., 2007). The TCT and SRT test procedures followed Experiment 2 of Meng et al ., (2019) exactly, in which ten CI subjects (9/10 adults) with various hearing histories were tested.…”
Section: Vocoders and Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adaptive staircase SRT in noise test was administered to further evaluate the performance of eVoice. This SRT measurement method was adopted from our previous studies (Meng et al, 2016(Meng et al, , 2019 with two minor changes: (1) the stimulus presentation time was reduced from three at most to two at most, and (2) the correctness judgment threshold was changed from 50% words in a sentence to 80% words. The first was done to reduce experiment time.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRTs for each condition with and without eVoice were tested. For each condition, two types of background noise were used: SSN and babble noise, which were generated using the method described in section "Speech Stimuli and Tasks" of Experiment 2 in Meng et al (2019). The SRT for each condition-background combination was tested twice using two different MHINT lists, and the results were averaged between the two lists as the final SRT.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation