Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions

Abstract

The role of biotic interactions in shaping plant flowering phenology has long been controversial; plastic responses to the abiotic environment, limited precision of biological clocks and inconsistency of selection pressures have generally been emphasized to explain phenological variation. However, part of this variation is heritable and selection analyses show that biotic interactions can modulate selection on flowering phenology. Our review of the literature indicates that pollinators tend to favour peak or earlier flowering, whereas pre-dispersal seed predators tend to favour off-peak or later flowering. However, effects strongly vary among study systems. To understand such variation, future studies should address the impact of mutualist and antagonist dispersal ability, ecological specialization, and habitat and plant population characteristics. Here, we outline future directions to study how such interactions shape flowering phenology. IntroductionFor plant reproduction, timing is everything. An individual plant that flowers too early, before it has had time to accumulate sufficient material resources, will have a limited capacity for seed production. One that delays flowering might gain higher capacity, but might also run out of time to use it before the end of the season. Flowering phenology is affected by many environmental factors, among which temperature and photoperiod, which are reliable signals of seasons, are probably the best studied. Accurate detection of such environmental cues and the resulting plastic response of plants enable flowering to occur when climatic conditions are most suitable for reproduction. Thus, resources and conditions impose bottom-up selective forces on phenology.By contrast, top-down forces act on reproductive timing, particularly those imposed by mutualists (pollinators and seed dispersers) and antagonists (floral pathogens and predispersal seed predators). Here, we review recent progress in understanding some of the top-down selective forces that act on reproductive timing. We highlight what is known,

Reproductive system of a mixed-mating plant responds to climate perturbation by increased selfing

“…Persistent herbivory, for example, may prevent rapid changes in community composition by suppressing species that might otherwise thrive in the new climate [7]. Pollen limitation, whether associated with climate change or non-climatic factors such as habitat loss, can potentially hamper how plants respond to perturbations by limiting pollen flow [7,[16][17][18]. Climate perturbations, or the short-term effects of climate change, may also widen the competitive differences between dominant exotic and rarer native species [19].…”

Impact of Intensive Sylviculture System (Tptii/Silin) on Understory Bird Community at Triwira Asta Bharata Forest Concession, East Kalimantan

“…Banyaknya pertumbuhan semai dan anakan, serta banyaknya tumbuhan penghasil bunga dan buah, akan menyebabkan banyaknya serangga yang datang ke areal tersebut (Ghazoul, 2006;Stang et al, 2006;Elzinga et al, 2007), misalnya serangga pemakan daun, atau serangga pollinator yang tertarik pada melimpahnya pollen dan nektar (Ghazoul, 2006;Stang et al, 2006). Pendapat serupa juga dikemukakan oleh McGrath et al (2009) yang menyatakan bahwa melimpahnya serangga berhubungan erat dengan melimpahnya bunga, sebab kehadiran lebih banyak bunga akan mendatangkan lebih banyak serangga.…”

Genetic control of flowering in spotted gum, Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata and C. maculata

“…One possible driver of adaptation is the avoidance of anthesis during high-rainfall months to maximise the number of pollinators (Elzinga et al 2007). The northern coastal provenances receive 50% of the 1066 mm mean annual rainfall during the summer months from December to March.…”