2010
DOI: 10.4050/jahs.55.042008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tilt Rotor Pitch/Flight-Path Handling Qualities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This question was addressed in Ref. 22, developing the drop-back concept introduced by Gibson in Ref. 23.…”
Section: Flight-path Hqs In Airplane Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This question was addressed in Ref. 22, developing the drop-back concept introduced by Gibson in Ref. 23.…”
Section: Flight-path Hqs In Airplane Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty six different configurations were considered, spanning the Level 1-2 ranges of CAP and values ofT  from zero to unity (22) . Three pilots participated in the simulation trials and based on the mean HQRs awarded the HQ boundaries appear as in Fig.…”
Section: Flight-path Hqs In Airplane Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the follow-up research, the flight quality of the pitch channel was also analyzed, and the short-term response and bandwidth of airplane mode were analyzed correspondingly according to the MIL-STD-1797A flight quality specification (Padfield et al, 2006). Further, a new pitch/ flight-path handling qualities metric using the existing control anticipation parameter and a new pitch drop back parameter were developed for tilt-rotor aircraft (Cameron and Padfield, 2010). These results provided a theoretical basis for the analysis and optimization of tilt-rotor aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Pavel & Padfield, 2003) derived a relation between CAP and Q  and (Padfield & Meyer, 2003;Cameron & Padfield, 2010) connected CAP to other flying qualities parameters. One of the reasons the attitude quickness criterion has gained large acceptance was due to its physical interpretation (in the limiting case gives the time constant of the aircraft as a function of the time constant of the maneuver).…”
Section: Agility Quickness Metric As a Measurement Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%