Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1250790.1250836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight integrality gaps for Lovasz-Schrijver LP relaxations of vertex cover and max cut

Abstract: We study linear programming relaxations of Vertex Cover and Max Cut arising from repeated applications of the "liftand-project" method of Lovasz and Schrijver starting from the standard linear programming relaxation.For Vertex Cover, Arora, Bollobas, Lovasz and Tourlakis prove that the integrality gap remains at least 2 − ε after Ωε(log n) rounds, where n is the number of vertices, and Tourlakis proves that integrality gap remains at least 1.5 − ε after Ω((log n) 2 ) rounds. Fernandez de la Vega and Kenyon pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Schoenebeck, Tulsiani, and Trevisan [STT07b] show an integrality gap of 2 − ε remains after Ω(n) rounds of LS, which is optimal. This build on the previous work of Arora, Bollobas, Lovasz, and Tourlakis [ABL02,ABLT06,Tou06] who prove that even after Ω(log n) rounds the integrality gap of LS is at least 2 − ε, and that even after Ω((log n) 2 ) rounds the integrality gap of LS is at least 1.5 − ε.…”
Section: Previous Lower-bounds Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schoenebeck, Tulsiani, and Trevisan [STT07b] show an integrality gap of 2 − ε remains after Ω(n) rounds of LS, which is optimal. This build on the previous work of Arora, Bollobas, Lovasz, and Tourlakis [ABL02,ABLT06,Tou06] who prove that even after Ω(log n) rounds the integrality gap of LS is at least 2 − ε, and that even after Ω((log n) 2 ) rounds the integrality gap of LS is at least 1.5 − ε.…”
Section: Previous Lower-bounds Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complete comparison can be found in [Lau03]. While there have been a growing number of integrality gap lower bounds for the LS [ABL02,ABLT06,Tou06,STT07b], the LS+[BOGH + 03, AAT05,STT07a,GMPT06], and the SA [dlVKM07,CMM07] hierarchies, similar bounds for the Lasserre hierarchy have remained elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we will not use this fact in the paper. The metric ρ π µ with π uv = (−1) d(u,v) was previously used in the integrality gap constructions by de la Vega and Kenyon-Mathieu [6] and Schoenebeck, Trevisan, and Tulsiani [18]. We denote this metric by ρ alt µ .…”
Section: Relaxations For Max Cut and Vertex Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result for MAX CUT improves a result by de la Vega and Kenyon-Mathieu [6] who proved that the integrality gap remains 2 − ε after log c n rounds (where c < 1 is some fixed constant). Recently several very strong negative results were proved for other hierarchies: Schoenebeck, Trevisan, and Tulsiani [18] proved that the integrality gap for Vertex Cover and MAX CUT is 2 − ε after Ω(n) rounds of LS (Lovász-Schrijver relaxation of the LP program); Georgiou, Magen, Pitassi, and Tourlakis [7] proved that the integrality gap for Vertex Cover is 2 − ε after Ω( log n/ log log n) rounds of LS + (Lovász-Schrijver relaxation of the SDP program). Our results are not directly comparable with these results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was later Downloaded 02/19/13 to 161.116.164.20. Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php improved in [37,34,12] to more levels and to the semidefinite version LS+. For the SA hierarchy, it was shown in [8] that optimal gaps of 2 for vertex-cover and max-cut resist n Ω(1) levels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%