Thrush Infections of the Skin

Shelmire, Bedford

doi:10.1001/archderm.1925.02370120019002

Cited by 29 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several workers have postulated, therefore, the existence of a toxic substance responsible for some aspects of the pathogenicity of Candida.25,31·42·144·145 Some work has been done to demonstrate lethal properties of different cell extracts of Candida, 88,146149 but no attempt has been made to study other effects of such extracts. 9. Endotoxin of Candida I prepared a soluble and filterable extract by mechanical disintegration of the yeast cells of C. albicans.…”

Section: Acrodermatitis Enteropathicamentioning

confidence: 99%

Moniliasis in Pediatrics

Dobias¹

1957

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Acrodermatitis Enteropathicamentioning

confidence: 99%

Moniliasis in Pediatrics

Dobias¹

1957

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many of them are of little microbiological interest, rather they belong to the field of dermatology or pharmacology. Even eliminating most of these we shall take space to review only a few of the papers cited (10,15,33,65,123,125,172,186,193,194,251).…”

Section: Monilia5i5mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Yeast-Like Fungi: Candida and Brettanomyces

Skinner¹

1947

Bacteriological Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

names which we do not accept and have been corrected in accordance with the common interpretation of the International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature, the latter by Buchwald (26), the former by the author" (253). Henrici (111) called attention to the fact that the primary division of yeasts which produce mycelium from those which do not is one that is difficult to make in practice. Most yeasts, if they are studied sufficiently, will be found to produce pseudomycelium or sometime possibly even true mycelium. There are all gradations between no pseudomycelium at all and a pseudomycelium so well developed that it can hardly be differentiated from true mycelium except by following through its formation as it develops in the microscopic field. Stelling-Dekker avoided this difficulty by classifying together ascosporogenous yeasts with and without mycelium. Lodder chose to divide the Cryptococcaceae (Torulopsidaceae) into two subfamilies on this basis. Frankly, the author does not like this division but must confess that he cannot suggest a better one. It is evident that this has given Diddens and Lodder some difficulty also. Diddens and Lodder's subdivision of the Candidoideae into only three genera is both logical and convenient. It is made on the basis of the type of thallospores produced, blastospores or arthrospores. Forms which produce blastospores only are put in the genus Candida or the genus BreUanomyces, those which produce both blastospores and arthrospores are put in the genus Trichosporon, those which produce arthrospores but not blastospores are excluded from the family. These include such organisms as Geotrichum candidum (Oidium lactia). OLD AND RECENT CLASSIFICATIONS OF CANDIDA Candida albicans (Robin) Berkhout is not only the type species of the genus but it is the outstanding species in importance and interest. The confusion in the nomenclature of this species may be appreciated from the fact that Ciferri, Redaelli and Cavallero (52) in 1938 found 45 different binomial synonyms, Diddens and Lodder in 1942 (69) cite 87, and Conant and associates, in 1944 (56) state that there are 172 in the literature! It was just 100 years ago, in 1847, that Robin first described a species 1947] 23

show abstract

“…3. It was possible to grow in cultures the organism obtained from the various areas affected (scales, hair, nail and tongue).…”

Section: Report Of a Casementioning

confidence: 99%