2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throughput-optimal resource allocation in LTE-Advanced with distributed antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As ILSs have a well-defined size, any multi-band scheduling algorithm can be adapted to this purpose. As already stated, solving optimally the multi-band version of the most common scheduling algorithms (e.g., MaxC/I and PF) is NP-hard in general (see [28] ). We therefore use a commonplace heuristic, which consists in filling up one ILS at a time, starting from the double-muting one.…”
Section: Heuristic Solution For Small-scale Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As ILSs have a well-defined size, any multi-band scheduling algorithm can be adapted to this purpose. As already stated, solving optimally the multi-band version of the most common scheduling algorithms (e.g., MaxC/I and PF) is NP-hard in general (see [28] ). We therefore use a commonplace heuristic, which consists in filling up one ILS at a time, starting from the double-muting one.…”
Section: Heuristic Solution For Small-scale Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…one where a MaxC/I allocation has to be made on per-subband CQIs), subbands being replaced by ILSs, with the added complication that the dimension of ILSs is not known in advance, but is obtained as a result, as per constraints (v-vi). Since the multi-band-CQI scheduling problem has been proven to be NP-hard in [28], this one can only be NP-hard as well. In any case, solving it in a TTI's time is out of question, even for a small number of UEs (i.e., [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], as shown in [24].…”
Section: Small-scale Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, MaxC/I scheduling can be obtained at a complexity of ( ) log O N N , N being the number of UEs. When per-sub-band CQI are used, however, obtaining the maximum throughput becomes an NP-hard problem, as shown in (Accongiagioco et al, 2013), hence some heuristics are used to obtain suboptimal solutions. Recall that a UE can use one CQI in a TTI (typically, the minimum of all the CQIs in the sub-bands where it is allocated some RBs).…”
Section: Multi-band Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such schemes cannot scale with the number of UEs or cells, since both the amount of information to be conveyed and the algorithm complexity are infeasibly high. Under these settings, in fact, achieving an optimal result (i.e., a scheme that guarantees the maximum throughput on each TTI) is impossible in practice, since this requires solving to optimality an optimization problem that is too complex for a 1ms-timeframe [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%