2008
DOI: 10.1080/10913670802349766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Different Methods of Calculating Vertical Jump Height from Force Platform Data in Men and Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
255
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
9
255
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the highest AV QUA , for example, was obtained in CMJ<90°, and PREF situations where the highest linear speeds of center of mass and better performance were observed. It has been observed that in vertical jumps performed with higher squat depth, higher knee and hip flexion angles was obtained [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . This maneuver becomes inevitable in jumps with greater amplitude seeking to maintain body balance 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the highest AV QUA , for example, was obtained in CMJ<90°, and PREF situations where the highest linear speeds of center of mass and better performance were observed. It has been observed that in vertical jumps performed with higher squat depth, higher knee and hip flexion angles was obtained [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . This maneuver becomes inevitable in jumps with greater amplitude seeking to maintain body balance 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Herzog et al 11 in dynamic actions, in addition to contractile elements, the total muscle strength production is greatly influenced by the elastic elements. Thus, if in greater muscle lengths, greater contribution of these elements was observed, the involvement of the contraction "machinery" (sarcomere) would be reduced, decreasing neuronal recruitment and hence the EMG activity [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . For biarticular RF and BF muscles, the RMS values were similar during the concentric phase in the three situations tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the jump height in the US and FT_DI methods was defined as the vertical distance between the highest point during the jump and standing. Two studies have revealed the displacement of the centre of mass prior to take-off of 11.9 ± 2.1 and 14.4 ± 0.7 cm, respectively (20,21). Using the vertical displacement of the left lateral malleolus between the standing and take-off positions in the calibrated videos, the authors have quantified a distance of 10.8 ± 1.0 cm (95% CI 10.6 to 11.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All kinetic data were divided by body mass to allow for a normalized comparison of these data between sexes. Jump height was derived from the vertical velocity at take-off [19]. A modified reactive strength index (MRSI) was calculated as the jump height (m) divided by movement time (s) [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%