2012
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2011.644976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threat advantage: Perception of angry and happy dynamic faces across cultures

Abstract: The current study tested whether the perception of angry faces is cross-culturally privileged over that of happy faces, by comparing perception of the offset of emotion in a dynamic flow of expressions. Thirty Chinese and 30 European-American participants saw movies that morphed an anger expression into a happy expression of the same stimulus person, or vice versa. Participants were asked to stop the movie at the point where they ceased seeing the initial emotion. As expected, participants cross-culturally con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facial expressions of happiness and anger are known to have different hedonic impact [44,45]. A 2D morphing procedure like the one we used generates an image resulting from the linear interpolation of image features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial expressions of happiness and anger are known to have different hedonic impact [44,45]. A 2D morphing procedure like the one we used generates an image resulting from the linear interpolation of image features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even under such gross approximations, the dynamic displays provided a greater degree of realism than the static displays, with strong behavioural consequences (see Figures 4,5,7,8,and 9). In fact, this method for generating dynamic emotional expressions has been successfully used in many previous behavioural studies (e.g., Becker et al, 2012;Joormann & Gotlib, 2006;Kamachi et al, 2001;Lynch et al, 2006;Marinetti, Mesquita, Yik, Cragwall, & Gallagher, 2012;Oosterhof & Todorov, 2009;Yoshikawa & Sato, 2008) and it has been shown to elicit an enhanced neural response with respect to static emotional facial expressions (Sato, Fujimura, & Suzuki, 2008;see also LaBar et al, 2003). Interestingly, Ambadar, Schooler, and Cohn (2005) measured the accuracy of emotion recognition from videorecordings that preserved the dynamic characteristics of natural facial expressions of basic emotions (''dynamic'' condition) and from frame sequences in which only the first and last frame of the original video sequences were presented (''first-last'' condition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to quickly identify and respond to danger in the environment conveys substantial survival advantage, and threat-related stimuli therefore has a processing advantage (Calvo and Castillo, 2005; Vuilleumier and Schwartz, 2001). This includes threat-related facial expressions (Feldmann-Wustefeld et al, 2011; Holmes et al, 2009; Marinetti et al, 2012), even when presented at low levels of awareness (Mogg and Bradley, 1999). However, this bias may lead to socially undesirable behaviour if dysregulated.…”
Section: Emotional Facial Processing and Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%