2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thorn in My Spine: A case of a retained intradural extramedullary foreign body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "Spring Phenomenon" says the long-lasting FB could penetrate into the intra-dural space, gradually close to the cord and nerve roots [18]. Sometimes in Para-vertebral soft tissues and extra-medullary space, pieces of surgical equipments can retain which mimics with neoplasm [19]. In case of acute penetrating injury or suspected metallic FB, CT and Radiographs are considered to be a safe option [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The "Spring Phenomenon" says the long-lasting FB could penetrate into the intra-dural space, gradually close to the cord and nerve roots [18]. Sometimes in Para-vertebral soft tissues and extra-medullary space, pieces of surgical equipments can retain which mimics with neoplasm [19]. In case of acute penetrating injury or suspected metallic FB, CT and Radiographs are considered to be a safe option [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes in Para-vertebral soft tissues and extra-medullary space, pieces of surgical equipments can retain which mimics with neoplasm [19]. In case of acute penetrating injury or suspected metallic FB, CT and Radiographs are considered to be a safe option [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] Several cases were also reported of spinal foreign body granulomas from retained pieces of surgical instruments in the paravertebral soft tissues and extramedullary space, which are sometimes confused with neoplasm. [ 3 ] CT and radiographs are considered the first line imaging modalities when dealing with acute penetrating injury or suspected metallic foreign body, although MR has been shown to be a safe option. [ 3 ] However, MR can fail to show the foreign body when it is small or nonferromagnetic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 ] CT and radiographs are considered the first line imaging modalities when dealing with acute penetrating injury or suspected metallic foreign body, although MR has been shown to be a safe option. [ 3 ] However, MR can fail to show the foreign body when it is small or nonferromagnetic. [ 3 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of papers examining substance visibility were focused primarily on locating a variety of penetrating or ingested foreign bodies and just a few papers explored implanted marker options for tumour boundary markers prior to excision or radiotherapy planning 3 5–7 9. Foreign bodies that had been located, ranged in material from fish and chicken bones, batteries, plastics, coins, metal and wood splinters10–13 and it should be noted that some materials were missed even with the high sensitivity of modern MRI and CT 14 15. Pattamapospong et al 16 published results regarding the visibility of a number of substances on X-ray, CT and MRI and demonstrated a 100% specificity but only 58% sensitivity for fresh wood, dry wood, glass, plastic and porcelain using MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%