2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: Literature Review

Abstract: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of penetrating ulcer has excellent short-term and midterms results. The endovascular approach should be the first line management for aortic ulcer when intervention is indicated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sealing in zone 0 (ascending aorta), as was necessary in the present case due to a short proximal landing zone, confronts the clinician with other technical challenges (4,5). When choosing a debranching strategy with the proximal anastomosis in the ascending aorta, several options remain; the first is to perform the proximal anastomosis using a side-biting clamp, with its inherent risk of iatrogenic type-A dissection, which may be reduced by performing this anastomosis in an (partially) unloaded beating heart situation as described.…”
Section: Advantages and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Sealing in zone 0 (ascending aorta), as was necessary in the present case due to a short proximal landing zone, confronts the clinician with other technical challenges (4,5). When choosing a debranching strategy with the proximal anastomosis in the ascending aorta, several options remain; the first is to perform the proximal anastomosis using a side-biting clamp, with its inherent risk of iatrogenic type-A dissection, which may be reduced by performing this anastomosis in an (partially) unloaded beating heart situation as described.…”
Section: Advantages and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…From an anatomical point of view, the extent of the involved aorta is much less in PAU than aneurysmal disease and the lesion itself is also often short in length (6,11). These anatomical features may be, for example, favorable by limiting an important complication such as SCI occurrence but do impact on other threatening complications especially when located in the aortic arch (2,7,28). For example, the risk of stroke in patients with PAUs has been reported to be similar for TEVAR and open surgery (4% vs. 7%, respectively) (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2019;8(4):471-482 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs.2019.06.07 endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (2,3). Most PAUs are seen in the setting of diffuse and dense atherosclerotic disease, possibly including severe peripheral occlusive disease (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As type B PAUs are frequently localized, open surgical repair shows excellent results [3,8] and is considered the gold standard treatment. However, endovascular repair offers a less invasive approach in high-risk patients, showing good perioperative results with low 30-day mortality (4.8-7%) [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, a symptomatic PAU associated with an asymptomatic IIA are synchronous aortoiliac lesions associated with a high risk of rupture of either lesion but can be treated in a single-stage manner using an endovascular approach. Despite lack of endoleak, continued surveillance is important, although the frequency of surveillance is not well established [10,13]. In addition, patients with IIA frequently develop multiple aneurysms, suggesting that surveillance and screening remains a life-long concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%