1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(98)00053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness and spatial distributions of clastic dykes, northwest Sacramento Valley, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controls on the distribution of dyke swarms is not known, but may be related to the dimensions or connectivity of the parent units supplying sand and fluid to the intrusion network. Similar step‐like cumulative thickness curves have previously been reported for sandstone intrusions from subsurface (Lonergan et al , 2007) and outcrop data (Jolly et al , 1998).…”
Section: Kinematic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The controls on the distribution of dyke swarms is not known, but may be related to the dimensions or connectivity of the parent units supplying sand and fluid to the intrusion network. Similar step‐like cumulative thickness curves have previously been reported for sandstone intrusions from subsurface (Lonergan et al , 2007) and outcrop data (Jolly et al , 1998).…”
Section: Kinematic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the PGIC data, together with data from Greenland (Surlyk et al , 2007), Antarctica (Taylor, 1982), Japan (Hayashi, 1966) and California (Diller, 1889; Jolly et al , 1998) all plot within a consistent range of H / T values (grey fields on Fig. 8).…”
Section: Kinematic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We interpret the clustered intrusions as representing the initial state of intrusion propagation (Fig. 13) (Jolly et al . 1998).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Conditions and Timing Of Emplacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discordant wing-like parts are interpreted to be sandstone intrusions sourced from the concordant depositional part. The asymmetric geometry of sand injections may be due to (1) local heterogeneity in the host strata, such as presence of cemented mudstones or marls that may act as barrier to the vertical propagation of injections (2) interaction between the stress fields adjacent to synchronously propagating intrusions (Jolly et al, 1998;Vetel and Cartwright, 2010); (3) burial depth, preexisting faults within the sedimentary succession, or spatial variations in the stress state above and adjacent to the sand bodies (Jolly and Lonergan, 2002). The different acoustic impedance of the intrusions within the study area may be a result of several factors such as porosity, mineralogy, diagenesis, including physical and chemical consolidation .…”
Section: Origin Of the Bowl-and W-shaped Features Within The Segmentmentioning
confidence: 99%