2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of coal and paper mill sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many methods of the combustion process. This study that researches methods in combination with coal combustion characteristics by thermal analysis techniques, can provide strongly theoretical support for stabilizing the low calorific value fuel combustion, and offer energy use and low calorific value boiler burning some guidance significance [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods of the combustion process. This study that researches methods in combination with coal combustion characteristics by thermal analysis techniques, can provide strongly theoretical support for stabilizing the low calorific value fuel combustion, and offer energy use and low calorific value boiler burning some guidance significance [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second mass loss stage occurred from about 390 to 560 °C and was mainly due to the further decomposition and burning of lignin and afterwards, the combustion of chars Fan et al 2016). Above 600 °C, the DTG curve of paper had the third mass loss stage until 800 °C, which was attributed to the degradation of calcium carbonate and other minerals (Liao and Ma 2010). The combustion of textiles showed that the maximum rate of mass loss at 345.4 °C was attributable to the devolatilization and burning of cotton (mainly composed of cellulose, the main component of textiles).…”
Section: Mswmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…model-free for which the rate of decomposition must follow Eq. (1) [9], [10] .The iso-conversional method is more widely used compared to the fitting models as it provides the ability to compute kinetic parameters without prefixing the reaction order [4], [10], [14].. In contrast, the model-fitting kinetic method generally involves the use of a single heating rate, which will result in a variation of activation energy values due to mass and heat transfer effects [9] .…”
Section: -P2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model free method the rate of heterogeneous solidstate reactions described in Eq. (1), as suggested by [4], [9]- [11], [14], can be transformed into a nonisothermal rate expression, as a function of temperature at constant heating rate β,…”
Section: -P2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation