2002
DOI: 10.1021/je0200618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of the LiCl + H2O System

Abstract: Literature data for the solubility of lithium chloride salts (anhydrous LiCl, LiCl‚H 2 O, LiCl‚2H 2 O, LiCl‚ 3H 2 O, and LiCl‚5H 2 O) in pure water have been compiled and critically evaluated. These data have been represented by empirical temperature-molality expressions from which the coordinates of the eutectics and of the peritectics have been calculated. The thermodynamic properties of the LiCl salts have been calculated from their solubilities in pure water using two different models of aqueous LiCl solut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(73 reference statements)
7
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the data for LiCl Á H 2 O (s) , the standard Gibbs free energy of formation of LiCl Á H 2 O (s) and LiCl (s) has been calculated also. The calculated value of D f G LiClÁ2H 2 O in this work is equal to that reported by Monnin [25], however, the value D f G LiCl in this work is only similar to that given by Wagman [24] and quite different from that by Monnin [25]. In our recent work [26], we have compared the experimental water activity at saturation concentration at temperatures higher than T = 298.15 K and that calculated by the MSA model parameters given by Monnin et al [25], finding large difference between them.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the data for LiCl Á H 2 O (s) , the standard Gibbs free energy of formation of LiCl Á H 2 O (s) and LiCl (s) has been calculated also. The calculated value of D f G LiClÁ2H 2 O in this work is equal to that reported by Monnin [25], however, the value D f G LiCl in this work is only similar to that given by Wagman [24] and quite different from that by Monnin [25]. In our recent work [26], we have compared the experimental water activity at saturation concentration at temperatures higher than T = 298.15 K and that calculated by the MSA model parameters given by Monnin et al [25], finding large difference between them.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The calculated value of D f G LiClÁ2H 2 O in this work is equal to that reported by Monnin [25], however, the value D f G LiCl in this work is only similar to that given by Wagman [24] and quite different from that by Monnin [25]. In our recent work [26], we have compared the experimental water activity at saturation concentration at temperatures higher than T = 298.15 K and that calculated by the MSA model parameters given by Monnin et al [25], finding large difference between them. Although the MSA model parameters given by Monnin et al [25] can represent the water activities of the system (LiCl + H 2 O) up to solubility limit at T = 298.15 K, they are invalid at higher temperatures at salt concentrations up to saturation points.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low water contents are also unavailable as LiCl solutions are bounded by solubility and the precipitation of salts at low water activities. 35 Our measurements at 30°C for 1100 equivalent weight ͑EW͒ Nafion resulted in values between those reported in the literature, 1.0 Ͻ Ͻ 1.5. 16,17 However, run to run deviations prevent us from presenting a statistically significant result at these higher temperatures.…”
Section: B332supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Solubility of Alkali-Halide Salts in Water, m, Calculated by OEMC Using Three Sets of Joung and Cheatham's Molecular Models of Ions Compatible with Three Water Models, 8 Compared with Experimental Values17 and Results of the Henry Convention Ideal Solution Model, at T = 298.15 K, P = 1 bar, and Externally Imposed Solid Molar Chemical Potentials, μ(s) a The values for μ(s) were taken from the NBS tables 5 (NBS) and from Monnin et al18 (M) where indicated; otherwise, they were taken from the NIST-JANAF tables. 3 * denotes results for systems with poor convergence, which are discussed in the text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%