1989
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3812(89)80003-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of liquid methane+ethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CH 4 -C 2 H 6 system Gomes de Azevedo and Calado (1989) 90-104 0.03-0.51 15 Wichterle and Kobayashi (1972a) 130-200 0.01-52 135 Davalos et al (1976) 250 13-66 8 Gupta et al (1980) 260-280 17-71 52 Wei et al (1995) 210-270 3-65 54 CH 4 -C 3 H 8 system Wichterle and Kobayashi (1972b) 130-213 2-65 105 Reamer et al (1950) 277-361 7-102 128 Akers et al (1954) 158-273 3-100 81 Sage et al (1934) 293-363 10-96 55 CH 4 -nC 4 H 10 system Sage et al (1940) 294-394 2-132 124 Roberts et al (1962) 211-411 2-132 83 Wiese et al (1970) 278-378 14-133 25 Chen et al (1974) 144-278 1-129 173 Kahre (1974) 166-283 1-110 71 CH 4 -CO 2 system Donnelly and Katz (1954) 200-271 11-79 110 Kaminishi et al (1968) 233-273 37-82 14 Arai et al (1971) 253-288 26-85 28 Davalos et al (1976) 230-270 9-86 34 Mraw et al (1978) 153-219 7-65 51 Neumann and Walch (1968) 173-220 27-69 64 Al-Sahhaf et al (1983) 219-270 9-84 32 Xu et al (1992) 288-293 57-82 21 Wei et al (1995) 230-270 11-84 49 H 2 O-CH 4 system at temperatures between 600 and 647.2 K (the critical temperature of water), but it is beyond the scope of this paper. Among the experimental data for the vapor-liquid equilibria of the H 2 O-C 2 H 6 system, the ethane solubility data measured by and the water content data measured by Reamer et al (1943) and Yarrison et al (2006) cover larger P-T range.…”
Section: T (K) P (Bar) Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH 4 -C 2 H 6 system Gomes de Azevedo and Calado (1989) 90-104 0.03-0.51 15 Wichterle and Kobayashi (1972a) 130-200 0.01-52 135 Davalos et al (1976) 250 13-66 8 Gupta et al (1980) 260-280 17-71 52 Wei et al (1995) 210-270 3-65 54 CH 4 -C 3 H 8 system Wichterle and Kobayashi (1972b) 130-213 2-65 105 Reamer et al (1950) 277-361 7-102 128 Akers et al (1954) 158-273 3-100 81 Sage et al (1934) 293-363 10-96 55 CH 4 -nC 4 H 10 system Sage et al (1940) 294-394 2-132 124 Roberts et al (1962) 211-411 2-132 83 Wiese et al (1970) 278-378 14-133 25 Chen et al (1974) 144-278 1-129 173 Kahre (1974) 166-283 1-110 71 CH 4 -CO 2 system Donnelly and Katz (1954) 200-271 11-79 110 Kaminishi et al (1968) 233-273 37-82 14 Arai et al (1971) 253-288 26-85 28 Davalos et al (1976) 230-270 9-86 34 Mraw et al (1978) 153-219 7-65 51 Neumann and Walch (1968) 173-220 27-69 64 Al-Sahhaf et al (1983) 219-270 9-84 32 Xu et al (1992) 288-293 57-82 21 Wei et al (1995) 230-270 11-84 49 H 2 O-CH 4 system at temperatures between 600 and 647.2 K (the critical temperature of water), but it is beyond the scope of this paper. Among the experimental data for the vapor-liquid equilibria of the H 2 O-C 2 H 6 system, the ethane solubility data measured by and the water content data measured by Reamer et al (1943) and Yarrison et al (2006) cover larger P-T range.…”
Section: T (K) P (Bar) Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methane + Ethane . The excellent quality of BACKONE for this mixture has already been shown 7 by comparison with experimental data for VLE isotherms, densities in the homogeneous phases, and isochoric heat capacities . Figure shows a new comparison between the BACKONE results and the measurements of Grini et al for the isobaric enthalpy increments of methane + ethane for a temperature change from T 1 to T 2 .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Properties Of Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Excess Gibbs-energy model results of six mixtures at constant temperatures with model uncertainties calculated as the standard deviation between evaluations that differ in pseudo-random-number generator seed values for the sampling algorithm. The results are compared to experimental data for methane + ethane from Gomes de Azevedo and Calado,52 for tetrahydrofuran + furan and chloroform + tetrahydrofuran from Byer et al,53 and 1-propanol + 2-propanol from Haase and Tillmann 54. When available, the results are also compared to the UNIFAC model using the 2021 parameter set of the UNIFAC Consortium.55 Experimental data from which the experiment curves have been derived are provided in the Supporting Information, Figures S5−S7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%