1995
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199507000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal responses to swimming in three water temperatures: influence of a wet suit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trappe et al 26 found that use of a wetsuit in the swim reduced the afterdrop during a subsequent cycle. These findings are consistent with a conductive mechanism for the afterdrop,23 27–30 indicating slower rates of fall of T re on immersion in wet suits and smaller gradient from skin to deep body temperature 30. The current study extends the work of Trappe et al 26 30 to lower water temperatures and performance athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Trappe et al 26 found that use of a wetsuit in the swim reduced the afterdrop during a subsequent cycle. These findings are consistent with a conductive mechanism for the afterdrop,23 27–30 indicating slower rates of fall of T re on immersion in wet suits and smaller gradient from skin to deep body temperature 30. The current study extends the work of Trappe et al 26 30 to lower water temperatures and performance athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, this post-immersion period deserves attention in terms of the supervision of swimmers who, on finishing their race, may have the lowest deep body temperature they have experienced whilst unsupervised and travelling home, or, in the case of triathletes, go from swimming to cycling on a cold, wet day, and performance may be significantly impaired. Although the area of post-cold immersion rewarming has been well reviewed in the survival-related literature [30-32], it is less well considered in the sporting literature [33]. …”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical background revealed a great concern with reducing drag by using the most appropriate swimsuit for the period (Foster et al, 2012;Hagedorn, 2013) and for the material (Matsunami and Taimura, 2008;Abasi et al, 2013;Issurin et al, 2014), to bring about a significant improvement thanks to technological innovations (Mountjoy et al, 2009). Since the 1930s a variety of studies had been carried out, mostly with triathletes (Parsons and Day, 1986;Sharp and Costill, 1989;Toussaint et al, 1989;Cordain and Kopriva, 1991;Chatard et al, 1995;Starling et al, 1995;Trappe et al, 1995), in which the conclusions were a long way from extrapolated to the competitive swimming of the time, before FINA approved the use of high-speed swimsuits in 1999, also known as technological or modified swimsuits (Craik, 2011;Foster et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development underwent a quantum leap with the introduction of polyurethane products, then cotton, silk, nylon and lycra (Davies, 1997). Even so, several studies were conducted in which the variables were the type of material, design and body coverage (Parsons and Day, 1986;Sharp and Costill, 1989;Toussaint et al, 1989;Cordain and Kopriva, 1991;Chatard et al, 1995;Starling et al, 1995;Trappe et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%