Thermal reactions involving solids: a personal view of selected features of decompositions, thermal analysis and heterogeneous catalysis

Abstract

Convinced that some recent trends in the literature concerned with reactions involving solids have been unproductive, even discouraging interest in the subject, this reviewer analyses the reasons and charts a way forward. In particular, two topics are discussed: thermal analysis and activation energy. Thermal analysis, automated collection and interpretation of kinetic data for solid(?)-state decompositions, resulted in huge numbers of publications between late 1970s and 2010. Measurements were frequently minimalistic (few, often no, confirmatory tests complemented rate data). Kinetic data interpretations were based on the Arrhenius activation model, inapplicable to these assumed, usually unconfirmed, solid-state(?) reactions. Energy distributions within crystalline reactants differ from those of 'free-flying' gaseous reactants, and thus, mechanistic proposals are entirely speculative. Such studies yielded little more than the reaction temperature: no meaningful insights into reaction chemistry, controls, mechanisms. Despite my several highly critical articles, these inconsequential studies continued. Overall, this now sidelined topic impacted adversely on solid-state chemistry, activation energy, E. Concurrently with the above studies, L'vov published a theoretical explanation for the magnitude of E: the Congruent Dissociative Volatilisation (CDV), thermochemical approach. This was also ignored by the 'Thermoanalytical Community', possibly because it assumes an initial volatilisation step: it appears that many solid-state scientists are prejudiced against mechanisms involving a phase change. The value of this novel theory (CDV) in identifying controls and mechanisms of solid-state reactions is discussed here. This review is positive: an interesting branch of main-stream chemistry remains open for exploration, expansion, explanation and exploitation! Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Tribochemistry, Mechanical Alloying, Mechanochemistry: What is in a Name?

“…Any transformation that is somehow facilitated by mechanical energy, or reactions that result from thermal- or photochemically induced stress and strain in a solid [the chemomechanochemical effect ( Boldyrev, 2018 )] seem now to be denoted as “mechanochemical”. Thermal or photochemical transformations in solids which have been mechanically pre-treated are similarly denoted as being “mechanically activated”, and hence also fall within the current paradigm of mechanochemistry ( Boldyrev, 2018 ; Galwey, 2020 ; Shields et al, 2020 ).…”

“…Thermal or photochemical transformations in solids which have been mechanically pre-treated are similarly denoted as being 'mechanically activated', and hence also fall within the current paradigm of mechanochemistry. [246][247][248] With this growing diversity of the community and the phenomena being explored comes a confusion of scientific languages on the scale of the Tower of Babel. Terminologies and jargon used by experts from one discipline are often misunderstood by experts from a different background.…”

Sn Doping on Ta2O5 Facilitates Glucose Isomerization for Enriched 5‐Hydroxymethylfurfural Production and its True Response Prediction using a Neural Network Model

“…The thermal stability characteristics were determined through the thermogravimetric analysis, which measures the catalyst's weight loss against change in temperature with respect to time [18] . The measurements were made at two different temperature regions, i. e., up to 200 °C (zone I) and up to 800 °C (zone II).…”

“…Presumably, the loosely bound self‐accumulated Sn might have escaped at higher temperatures, altering the amorphous state of Ta 2 O 5 . Nevertheless, the increased Sn concentration improved the catalyst's hydrophobicity through the improved crystallinity, which is an added advantage since it restricts the capture of environmental moisture [18] . As a result, the modified catalysts attained a minimum weight loss (≤9 %).…”

A Two-Level Approach to Describing the Process of Composite Synthesis

“…The problem of modeling physicochemical transformations involving solids is not new and finds a variety of solutions in solidstate chemistry and continuum mechanics. The following can be added to the features already mentioned [52]. Because of the low mobility of components, reactions localize at and near interfaces.…”