1986
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/19/10/014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of a Tm impurity in metals in a jj-coupling model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a representative value Γ = 0.3eV, this ratio gives a Kondo temperature of T K ∼ 600K, i.e., sixtyfold larger than the 10K seen in UBe 13 . Hence, contrary to previous claims for an uranium ion with full spherical symmetry [14], our model does not support a small energy scale in the limit of strong valence fluctuations. Figure 2 also presents a comparison between the Monte Carlo approach and the NCA [3].…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For a representative value Γ = 0.3eV, this ratio gives a Kondo temperature of T K ∼ 600K, i.e., sixtyfold larger than the 10K seen in UBe 13 . Hence, contrary to previous claims for an uranium ion with full spherical symmetry [14], our model does not support a small energy scale in the limit of strong valence fluctuations. Figure 2 also presents a comparison between the Monte Carlo approach and the NCA [3].…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The first calculations to show this were variational, by Yafet et al [14], who obtained singlet ground states with very small binding energies throughout the range of valence. A 1 /N scheme that gave the same results at zero temperature was developed to leading order by Read et al [15]. The same low energy scale was found in a variational study of the f&-f' Anderson mode by Nunes et al [16].…”
Section: Low Temperature Properties Of the Two Magnetic State Andersomentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In this paper we approached the f 2 À f 3 Anderson model for a uranium impurity in a free electron medium (metal) treated in a j-j coupling scheme in the limit of zero j-j coupling in the same way as other authors have done for Ce-like [14] and Tm-like [20] models, introducing slave bosons (two are needed here) and making the mean-field (static) approximation (fluctuations around the mean-field values are associated to the dynamics of the boson fields [21][22][23] and are analogous to the 1/N corrections(self-energies) to the energy scale [6,24]). By comparing with previous works [6, 24] whose correctness has been established for N !…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eq. (3), a, b (a + , b + ) are boson annihilation (creation) operators, introduced [20] as a bookkeeping device similar to that of Coleman [16]. These bosons (two are needed here) are a brilliant contrivance firstly introduced by Coleman [16] to prevent the system going into forbidden occupation states, such as f 0 ; f 1 and f 4 ; f 5 ; .…”
Section: Bosonized Anderson Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation