2010
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The X-factor: visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
118
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These include growth on moistened germination paper rolls or pouches, sand rhizotrons, rhizoboxes, in compost followed by washing, soil columns and gelbased systems where phenotypic effects can be imaged using flatbed scanners, digital cameras, lasers, or even x-ray computed tomography (CT) (Hetz et al, 1996;Whiting et al, 2000;Bengough et al, 2004;Fang et al, 2009;French et al, 2009;Gregory et al, 2009;Hammond et al, 2009;Iyer-Pascuzzi et al, 2010;Trachsel et al, 2010;Tracy et al, 2010Tracy et al, , 2011Chapman et al, 2011;Lobet et al, 2011;Lucas et al, 2011). Magnetic resonance imaging (for noninvasive analysis of root structures) and positron emission tomography (for analysis of carbon transport and accumulation) can be combined to study the dynamics of structure-function relationships of roots in real soils in a noninvasive manner .…”
Section: How To Image Root Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include growth on moistened germination paper rolls or pouches, sand rhizotrons, rhizoboxes, in compost followed by washing, soil columns and gelbased systems where phenotypic effects can be imaged using flatbed scanners, digital cameras, lasers, or even x-ray computed tomography (CT) (Hetz et al, 1996;Whiting et al, 2000;Bengough et al, 2004;Fang et al, 2009;French et al, 2009;Gregory et al, 2009;Hammond et al, 2009;Iyer-Pascuzzi et al, 2010;Trachsel et al, 2010;Tracy et al, 2010Tracy et al, , 2011Chapman et al, 2011;Lobet et al, 2011;Lucas et al, 2011). Magnetic resonance imaging (for noninvasive analysis of root structures) and positron emission tomography (for analysis of carbon transport and accumulation) can be combined to study the dynamics of structure-function relationships of roots in real soils in a noninvasive manner .…”
Section: How To Image Root Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For plants grown in soil, x-ray CT techniques and magnetic resonance imaging (Heeraman et al, 1997;Nagel et al, 2009;Tracy et al, 2010;Lucas et al, 2011;Zhu et al, 2011) have recently increased our capabilities to visualize root system architecture in situ nondestructively. For example, the x-ray CT technique can be used to study root architectures under varying nutrient, moisture, temperature, and soil density conditions in a physiologically relevant way over time.…”
Section: How To Image Root Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive techniques provide insight about root systems by extrapolating root information from soil cores and root crowns of field-grown plants (Trachsel et al, 2011) or from plants grown in controlled growth systems including hydroponic, pouch, pot, and plate systems. In situ methods involving rhizotron, magnetic resonance, and computed tomography techniques have also been developed to facilitate nondestructive spatial and temporal investigations into root systems grown in soil (Taylor et al, 1990;Gregory et al, 2003;Tracy et al, 2010); however, the current scale, resolution, throughput, and cost efficiency of these techniques limit their utility. Additionally, simulation and modeling studies that integrate rhizosphere and growth data help form links between predictive techniques and field studies, allowing researchers to strategically predict, evaluate, and target beneficial root traits or genotypes for specific growth environments (Berntson, 1994;Ho et al, 2004;de Dorlodot et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging techniques for the visualization of soilgrown root systems in two and three dimensions include x-ray computed tomography (Heeraman et al, 1997;Tracy et al, 2010;Mooney et al, 2012), neutron radiography (NR; Oswald et al, 2008), and magnetic resonance imaging (Pohlmeier et al, 2008). NR is one of the most suitable techniques to investigate roots grown in soil, because it allows a high throughput, provides a strong contrast between roots and soil, and therefore requires little effort for image processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%