2013
The View from the Driver's Seat: What Good Is Salience?
Abstract: A set of experiments gauged the value of salient and non-salient visual information to drivers' decision making. Stimuli were images of traffic scenes viewed from a drivers' approximate perspective, and the subjects' task was to make stop-or-go driving judgments. Under some experimental conditions (Experiment 1), subjects viewed only the salient information from within each scene. Under other conditions (Experiments 2-3), they viewed only the non-salient information. A signal detection measure of sensitivity s…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
14
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
5
0
1
Year Published
2016
2024
Publication Types
Select...
9
5
1
Relationship
0
15
Authors
Journals
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 71 publications
0
5
0
1
“…controlling for top-down salience). While previous studies demonstrating SSMs tended to rely exclusively on the former of these two types of attention processing, the complexity and familiarity of driving has been shown to be influenced by both of these attentional processes (McCarley, Steelman, & Horrey, 2014). Furthermore, controlling for top-down salience of the target items was also important for distinguishing the root cause of a driver's inability to locate the low-salience item when presented along side its high-salient counterpart.…”
Section: Apparatus and Stimulimentioning
confidence: 77%
“…controlling for top-down salience). While previous studies demonstrating SSMs tended to rely exclusively on the former of these two types of attention processing, the complexity and familiarity of driving has been shown to be influenced by both of these attentional processes (McCarley, Steelman, & Horrey, 2014). Furthermore, controlling for top-down salience of the target items was also important for distinguishing the root cause of a driver's inability to locate the low-salience item when presented along side its high-salient counterpart.…”
Section: Apparatus and Stimulimentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Untuk itu, beberapa metode dikembangkan untuk menganalisa variabel ini. Contohnya dengan menggunakan conspicuity index (Porathe & Strand, 2011) dan metode deteksi dengan deep saliency scanning (Li et al, 2018;McCarley et al, 2014).…”
Section: B Riset Pendahuluunclassified
“…Ward & Wilde (1996) found that drivers slowed down more often in obstructed HRGCs than unobstructed ones. Outside of rail-highway research, McCarley et al (2014) demonstrated…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
