2021
DOI: 10.1177/03635465211027180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Background: The International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT-33) was developed to evaluate patients seeking surgery for hip and/or groin (hip/groin) pain and may not be appropriate for those seeking nonsurgical treatment. Purpose: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the iHOT-33 total (iHOT-Total) score and all subscale scores in adults with hip/groin pain who were not seeking surgery. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with hip/groin pain who were not seeking surg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Differences in the scoring (ordinal 24 [7] 26 [6] 23 [5] 26 [6] 24 [10] 26 [6] Body mass index (kg/m Symptom duration (months) 18 [30] 24 [32] 24 [38] 24 [33] 14 [12] 30 [41] Soccer vs continuous and per-person vs per-hip) and/or unique questions within the iHOT-33 may have influenced the scores and hence the relationships with cam morphology size. Although relationships existed for most iHOT-33 scores, model estimates determined that alpha angle differences of more than 20° would be required to manifest as clinically important score differences between our football players, 22 and smaller alpha angle differences were less likely to be meaningful. Furthermore, small pseudo R 2 values for univariable models found that only 4.6% to 8.7% of the variance in iHOT-33 scores was explained by alpha angle, indicating that the severity of pain, symptoms, and functional impairment reported by our football players was mostly impacted by factors other than anterosuperior cam morphology size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…33 Differences in the scoring (ordinal 24 [7] 26 [6] 23 [5] 26 [6] 24 [10] 26 [6] Body mass index (kg/m Symptom duration (months) 18 [30] 24 [32] 24 [38] 24 [33] 14 [12] 30 [41] Soccer vs continuous and per-person vs per-hip) and/or unique questions within the iHOT-33 may have influenced the scores and hence the relationships with cam morphology size. Although relationships existed for most iHOT-33 scores, model estimates determined that alpha angle differences of more than 20° would be required to manifest as clinically important score differences between our football players, 22 and smaller alpha angle differences were less likely to be meaningful. Furthermore, small pseudo R 2 values for univariable models found that only 4.6% to 8.7% of the variance in iHOT-33 scores was explained by alpha angle, indicating that the severity of pain, symptoms, and functional impairment reported by our football players was mostly impacted by factors other than anterosuperior cam morphology size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3 Modest relationships between anterosuperior cam morphology size and iHOT-33 scores suggest that factors other than cam morphology may influence self-reported burden in football players with FAI syndrome. It is unclear why relationships were limited to the iHOT-33 only, considering that the HAGOS and iHOT-33 examine equivalent dimensions of hip/groin pain 22 and share many similar questions. 33 Differences in the scoring (ordinal 24 [7] 26 [6] 23 [5] 26 [6] 24 [10] 26 [6] Body mass index (kg/m Symptom duration (months) 18 [30] 24 [32] 24 [38] 24 [33] 14 [12] 30 [41] Soccer vs continuous and per-person vs per-hip) and/or unique questions within the iHOT-33 may have influenced the scores and hence the relationships with cam morphology size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The iHOT-33 and HAGOS are self-reported questionnaires recommended for assessing young- to middle-aged adults with hip/groin pain. 20,51,56…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome of interest was the International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33), both improvement data and primary data [ 15 ]. This outcome was designed to measure the hip-related quality of life in young adults with non-arthritic hip pain.…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%