1968
DOI: 10.13182/nse68-a18824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of the Straightahead Approximation in Space-Vehicle Shielding Studies—Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HZETRN utilizes the straight ahead approximation in which all fragments are assumed to propagate in the same direction as the projectile. The assumption is accurate for high energy charged particles but begins to break down for low energy neutrons which are nearly isotropic [Alsmiller et al 1965]. This is significant for heavily shielded space vehicles, surface habitats, and high altitude aircraft where secondary neutron production is important in exposure calculations [Getselev et al 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HZETRN utilizes the straight ahead approximation in which all fragments are assumed to propagate in the same direction as the projectile. The assumption is accurate for high energy charged particles but begins to break down for low energy neutrons which are nearly isotropic [Alsmiller et al 1965]. This is significant for heavily shielded space vehicles, surface habitats, and high altitude aircraft where secondary neutron production is important in exposure calculations [Getselev et al 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where e G is positive provided G o completely encloses G. The most strongly scattered component is the neutron field for which an 0.2 percent error results for semi-infinite media in most practical problems [20,21]. Standard practice in space radiation protection replaces G as required at some point on the boundary and along a given ray by the corresponding G N evaluated for normal incidence on a semi-infinite slab.…”
Section: Transport Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors in this approximation are second order in the ratio of beam divergence and radius of curvature of the object [20], rarely exceeds a few percent for space radiations, and are always conservative. The replacement of G by G N as a highly accurate approximation [21] for space shielding applications has the added advantages that G N is the natural quantity for comparison with laboratory simulations and has the following properties: If G N is known at a plane a distance x o from the boundary (assumed at the origin), then the value of G N at…”
Section: Transport Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest order approximation using the straightahead approximation was guided by the nucleon transport studies of Alsmiller et al (1968) using the Monte Carlo methods in which the differential cross sections were approximated as…”
Section: Straightahead Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the second term on the right hand side of equation (12) results from corrections in assuming the velocity of the ion is preserved in the interaction (Curtis andWilkinson, 1972, Wilson 1977) and the third term is error resulting from the straightahead assumption (Alsmiller et al 1968, Wilson 1977. The surprising result is that the velocity conserving assumption is inferior to the straightahead approximation for the nearly isotropic space radiation.…”
Section: Straightahead Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%