2018
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-018-0938-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validation of the Hungarian version of the ID-migraine questionnaire

Abstract: BackgroundDespite its high prevalence, migraine remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. ID-Migraine is a short, self-administrated questionnaire, originally developed in English by Lipton et al. and later validated in several languages. Our goal was to validate the Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire.MethodsPatients visiting two headache specialty services were enrolled. Diagnoses were made by headache specialists according to the ICHD-3beta diagnostic criteria. There were 309 clinically diagno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 ). Both instruments have been translated and validated for use in several languages [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Diagnostic Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 ). Both instruments have been translated and validated for use in several languages [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Diagnostic Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel hybrid questionnaire instrument, in two parts, was developed to avoid issues noted with other investigative scales. Many traditional measurements are perceived as too lengthy, requiring frequent re-ratings, prolonged survey time, which generally adds a measurement bias and lower compliance, and may use scoring criteria which may be difficult for the subject to understand [46][47][48][49]. The Colorado Center for Health and Sports Science Institutional Review Board (CCHSS IRB) reviewed the applicants, with forty (N=40) subjects being accepted into and completing the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel hybrid instrument was developed to avoid common problems noted with other scales. These issues include being too lengthy, requiring responses too frequently, prolonged study periods leading to recall bias and lowered compliance, as well as proprietary forms that required payment for use [36][37][38][39]. Subject applicants were then reviewed and approved by the Colorado Center for Health and Sports Science Institutional Review Board (CCHSS IRB), with fourteen (N=14) subjects being accepted into and completing the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%