2015
DOI: 10.1177/1747493015607505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of the RoPE score in cryptogenic stroke patients ≤50 years in predicting a stroke-related patent foramen ovale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score was used to differentiate between patients with a high probability of a stroke-related PFO (high attributable risk) vs. an incidental PFO. ( 26 , 28 ) The RoPE score is externally validated ( 28 , 29 ) and varies from 0 to 9 points with higher scores indicating a higher attributable risk. In stroke patients with PFO and a RoPE score >5 points, the PFO has an attributable risk for stroke of 62% or more ( 28 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score was used to differentiate between patients with a high probability of a stroke-related PFO (high attributable risk) vs. an incidental PFO. ( 26 , 28 ) The RoPE score is externally validated ( 28 , 29 ) and varies from 0 to 9 points with higher scores indicating a higher attributable risk. In stroke patients with PFO and a RoPE score >5 points, the PFO has an attributable risk for stroke of 62% or more ( 28 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, its efficacy has been tested in clinical practice; the fact that the risk of stroke recurrence was still high after PFO closure in patients with low RoPE score indicates that the stroke mechanism was indeed unrelated to PFO (62). A study in CS patients ≤50 years reported that RoPE score above 7 is the optimal limit for identifying a causative relationship of PFO and CS (63). It should be emphasized though, that the RoPE score does not characterize the risk of stroke associated with PFO individually, but it rather provides a guide to define whether the relationship of PFO with CS after the index event is causative or not (6).…”
Section: The Rope Score and Pfo As An Incidential Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score has been developed and validated as an assessment tool to determine the probability that a PFO is responsible for a cryptogenic stroke 49, 50. It can be used when assessing patients with a PFO preceding closure (Table 2).…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%