2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3649-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of international shoulder joint replacement registries and databases: a comparative analytic review of two hundred and sixty one thousand, four hundred and eighty four cases

Abstract: This study indicates that the indications for and application of shoulder arthroplasty have important geographical variations and that these variations must be considered when comparing outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty from different locations. Without controlling for age, gender, diagnosis and procedure type, the results from one national registry may not be applicable to patients from a different location. In that national data provide the opportunity to reduce costs by identifying implants and procedures w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this observed trend is in line with the findings from other countries [13,28], including the United States [9], it is in contrast with the trend seen in hip and knee arthroplasties, where the incidence rate in younger and older patients remained constant over all age groups [2]. This difference may be explained by various factors.…”
Section: Projections As a Function Of Age And Indicationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…While this observed trend is in line with the findings from other countries [13,28], including the United States [9], it is in contrast with the trend seen in hip and knee arthroplasties, where the incidence rate in younger and older patients remained constant over all age groups [2]. This difference may be explained by various factors.…”
Section: Projections As a Function Of Age And Indicationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Publications are usually available on the Internet; however the credibility of the published data is a matter of debate. Open sources with registries of procedures provide professional data [14][15][16][17]. Other sources including some large public databases or public channels can include biased information or even inaccurate data [18] data found on the Internet is of debatable value [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedure or implant-related databases and registries could be the solution for understanding outcomes based on the average professional. This is particularly true in procedures that are growing in volume, such as the shoulder arthroplasty [9] and also in the follow-up of new implants or procedures on a local, regional, or national basis [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%