2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Video Annotation Tools in Teacher Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Google Drive and Annotation Studio (ht tp://uma.annotationstudio.org/) were used for text annotations. The latter is a tool created by MIT's Digital Humanities Laboratory' HyperStudio (EEUU) http://hyperstudio.mit.edu (Paradis & Fendt, 2016) and used in the Vidanet project to test the educational institutions participating in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Google Drive and Annotation Studio (ht tp://uma.annotationstudio.org/) were used for text annotations. The latter is a tool created by MIT's Digital Humanities Laboratory' HyperStudio (EEUU) http://hyperstudio.mit.edu (Paradis & Fendt, 2016) and used in the Vidanet project to test the educational institutions participating in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video annotation refers to the software which enables taking notes on any particular moment of a video (Perez-Torregrosa et al, 2017). This allows asynchronous computer-mediated communication (Howard & Myers, 2010).…”
Section: Evidence-based Multimodal Reflective Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In behavior analysis, Mirriahi et al ( 2016 ) investigated cluster diagrams of video annotation behavior and determined that viewers reflected one of four behavior types: minimalist, disenchanted, task-focused, or intensive group clusters. Pérez-Torregrosa et al ( 2017 ) reviewed the literature on video annotation and noted that prior to 2017, only 19 studies had been conducted on video annotation in education; they provide an overview of the increase in studies of video annotation in learning interventions from 2006 to 2016. In neither the studies reviewed by Pérez-Torregrosa et al ( 2017 ) nor any other the others mentioned here, has video annotation been interrogated from a semiotic lens.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pérez-Torregrosa et al ( 2017 ) reviewed the literature on video annotation and noted that prior to 2017, only 19 studies had been conducted on video annotation in education; they provide an overview of the increase in studies of video annotation in learning interventions from 2006 to 2016. In neither the studies reviewed by Pérez-Torregrosa et al ( 2017 ) nor any other the others mentioned here, has video annotation been interrogated from a semiotic lens. How dynamic imagetexts challenge learners to either learn or remain on the outside of our new media cultures is yet to be explored.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%