2007
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.89b8.19424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The Oxford hip and knee scores have been extensively used since they were first described in 1996 and 1998. During this time, they have been modified and used for many different purposes. This paper describes how they should be used and seeks to clarify areas of confusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
821
1
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,042 publications
(845 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
821
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient self-report questionnaires should be used to add knowledge and allow more complete assessment of the patients' conditions [22]. The OHS, a 12-item, joint-specific, selfadministered questionnaire, has been studied extensively and is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for assessing hip pain and disability in patients undergoing THA [7,8,13,17,18,20]. Our study (1) cross-culturally adapted and (2) validated the OHS for use with Germanspeaking patients with hip osteoarthritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patient self-report questionnaires should be used to add knowledge and allow more complete assessment of the patients' conditions [22]. The OHS, a 12-item, joint-specific, selfadministered questionnaire, has been studied extensively and is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for assessing hip pain and disability in patients undergoing THA [7,8,13,17,18,20]. Our study (1) cross-culturally adapted and (2) validated the OHS for use with Germanspeaking patients with hip osteoarthritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also should be reliable, valid, and sensitive to clinical change [19]. The Oxford hip score (OHS), a 12-item, joint-specific, self-administered questionnaire, has been studied extensively since its development and is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for assessing hip pain and disability in patients undergoing THA [7,8,13,17,18,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical data were collected preoperatively and at one and five years following surgery by the same independent assessor and included Oxford Knee Score (OKS) [9,20], American Knee Society functional and objective scores (AKSS-fcn and AKSS-obj respectively) [17], and Tegner activity scale [25]. One year was determined as the principal follow-up interval because it has been demonstrated that the majority of the functional improvement after knee arthroplasty is within the first year [7,21,6,23]; a subset of these patients have attained five years' follow-up and we also present their five-year data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients underwent CT scans of the lower limb according to the standardized Perth protocol [12], and detailed measurement of coronal, sagittal, and rotational alignment was performed by a blinded independent assessor (CG, SH). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS, 0-48 worst to best) [33], the reduced WOMAC (0-100 worst to best) score [42], the pain and function components of the Knee Society Score (KSS, 0-100 worst to best) [26], the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS, 0-100 worst to best) [4,31], EuroQol EQ-5D [11], and visual analog scales measuring pain at rest and when mobilizing (0-10 none to worst). Scores were measured preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%