The use of structured debate as a teaching strategy among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review

Cariñanos-Ayala, Susana; Arrue, Marta; Zarandona, Jagoba; Labaka, Ainitze

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104766

Cited by 13 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other aspects of the formal structure include the number of team members, purpose of each participant's turn, and even the activities that occur outside of the debate [2]. While information about participant educational background or preparation is not readily available to researchers in many digital spaces, it may be critical to know whether participants in a debate accessed information on their own or if they were all given the same information prior to the debate.…”

Section: Key Facets Of Structured Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interactions typically occur in either rounds or branches. In rounds, participants commonly engage in three phases: introduction, refutation, and conclusion [2]. Conversely, a branching structure allows participants to add support or rebuttals at any stage of the debate.…”

Section: Key Facets Of Structured Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introduction 11 Classroom and Online Structured Debatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Structured Debate (SD) is a form of discourse that occurs in various settings including politics, economics, law, and business [1], as well as education [2]. SD is unique in that participant contributions are heavily structured and are arranged in a dichotomous "pro" / "con" configuration, that is, arguments for or against an initial claim [2]. As a pedagogical tool, SD promotes critical and rational thinking; students are required to organize and convey their thoughts in a logical and structured manner and need to be able to scrutinize and respond to claims made by the opposing side.…”

Section: Introduction 11 Classroom and Online Structured Debatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Online platforms are also beginning to offer a forum for such debating [4]; for example, DebateMap 1 , eDeb8 2 , and Kialo 3 provide an interface for participants to join a discussion on a certain topic. Several of these online platforms have been intentionally designed for pedagogical usage [5], while others have been retrofitted to serve the needs of educators [6].…”

Section: Introduction 11 Classroom and Online Structured Debatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Approaching Structured Debate with Quantitative Ethnography in Mind

Scianna

Kaliisa

Boisvenue

et al. 2022

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Structured Debate (SD) is a constrained discourse style that is popular in many different forums. The expansion of SD to online platforms leaves many questions about addressing this type of data during analysis. Quantitative Ethnography (QE) may provide a framework for the considerations that need to be made when analyzing SD datasets. In this paper, we review the ways in which QE methods are compatible with SD and the challenges associated with applying this method. Using data from an online, SD forum, we present a narrative of the decision-making process throughout the analysis process. We find that QE allows for myriad insights to be gained from this form of data depending on the approach one takes including insights into structures, content, and participation. This work intends to serve as a model for researchers hoping to utilize QE on SD and, more broadly, for approaching novel datasets.

show abstract

Section: Key Facets Of Structured Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Key Facets Of Structured Debatementioning

confidence: 99%