2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of micro-CT to evaluate cortical bone geometry and strength in nude rats: Correlation with mechanical testing, pQCT and DXA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
2
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
74
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative computed tomography (qCT), peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) and micro CT (μCT) are additional techniques that are superior to Xray in assessing bone geometry, mass and structure. X-ray with/without pQCT is the method of choice for in vivo follow-up due to its good correlation with the mechanical testing of bone strength [104]. The strength of bone and callus assessed via the 3-and/or 4-point bending method (or torsional testing performed ex vivo) supplements the assessment of bone regeneration quality and provides opportunities to correlate and accurately interpret radiologic and other data (serum biomarkers, histology).…”
Section: Methods and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative computed tomography (qCT), peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) and micro CT (μCT) are additional techniques that are superior to Xray in assessing bone geometry, mass and structure. X-ray with/without pQCT is the method of choice for in vivo follow-up due to its good correlation with the mechanical testing of bone strength [104]. The strength of bone and callus assessed via the 3-and/or 4-point bending method (or torsional testing performed ex vivo) supplements the assessment of bone regeneration quality and provides opportunities to correlate and accurately interpret radiologic and other data (serum biomarkers, histology).…”
Section: Methods and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outer and inner perimeter of the cortical midshaft was determined by a three-dimensional triangulation of the bone surface (BS) of the 20 slices, and cortical thickness was calculated as described. 24 …”
Section: Cortical Bone Assessment By Microctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source energy was 70 kV, current was 160 mA, scan time was 20.6 min, and voxel resolution was 8 mm. 28,29 A fixed global threshold method was used in this study based on manufacturer recommendations and preliminary studies, which showed that mineral variation between groups was not high enough to warrant adaptive thresholds. Porosity was calculated as (1-BV/TV), where BV/ TV is the relative bone volume as measured by voxel counting.…”
Section: Microct Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%