2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of landforms to predict the variability of soil and orange attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
42
1
28

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
42
1
28
Order By: Relevance
“…in this study, the variability of soil macroporosity (Ma) was very high (table 1). these results disagree with observations of Megda et al (2008), who reported medium variability for Ma and Siqueira et al (2010), who stated high variability for Ma. the variability of gravimetric soil water (gSw) was medium and low for soil water storage (SwS) (table 1).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…in this study, the variability of soil macroporosity (Ma) was very high (table 1). these results disagree with observations of Megda et al (2008), who reported medium variability for Ma and Siqueira et al (2010), who stated high variability for Ma. the variability of gravimetric soil water (gSw) was medium and low for soil water storage (SwS) (table 1).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Siqueira et al (2010), in a previous study of some soil properties, found the first two PCs to account for 57.62 % of the variance in combination; in addition, Carvalho Jr. et al (2008) examined various physical and chemical properties of soil and found PC1 to explain 28.29 % of their variance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apesar da formação dos solos não ocorrer de maneira aleatória (estocástica), a Figura 5 mostra um indicativo de que seus atributos mineralógicos podem ter este comportamento sendo recomendado utilizar a simulação estocástica SSG para a caracterização espacial confirmando a hipótese de Yamamoto Deste modo, é essencial testar outros algoritmos e técnicas que incorporem qualidade das informações geradas pela inferência espacial, conforme já reportado por Herbst et al (2010) e Siqueira et al (2010). Esta afirmação foi comprovada por Silva Júnior et al (2012b) em que a combinação da geoestatística com análise, juntamente com modelos de paisagem, é eficiente na caracterização espacial de atributos dos solos.…”
Section: Figura 1 Pontos De Amostragem (•) Em Malha Regularunclassified