2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00184-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of conformal radiotherapy and the selection of radiation dose in T1 or T2 low or intermediate risk prostate cancer – a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 A variety of 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy techniques have been described. While all utilize beam's-eye-view (BEV) conformal field shaping, beam trajectory and number differ between techniques and produce variable tradeoffs between target coverage and normal tissue irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A variety of 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy techniques have been described. While all utilize beam's-eye-view (BEV) conformal field shaping, beam trajectory and number differ between techniques and produce variable tradeoffs between target coverage and normal tissue irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 Brundage et al, as part of the Ontario Practice Guidelines process, also found considerable evidence for the use of dose-escalated EBRT (e.g., doses Ͼ 74 Gy) in the intermediate-risk group. 71 Nilsson et al, using the principles adopted by the Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care, reached the same conclusion. 72 Kuban et al reported the bFFS of a multiinstitutional cohort of 4839 patients with T1 and T2 prostate carcinoma who were treated with EBRT alone and were followed for a minimum of 5 years.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes After Dose Escalation For Intermediateriskmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Once more the minimum level required to achieve proper tumor control remains unknown. The Cancer Care Ontario guidelines [3] recommended a local dose in the range of 75-78 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%