2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-009-9276-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of Abell–Tersoff potentials in atomistic simulations of InGaAsSb/GaAs

Abstract: In this paper we show the use of an optimally parameterized empirical potential of the Abell-Tersoff type to study the strain energy of the quaternary alloy InGaAsSb. We use our results to compute modified segregation energies in an improved kinetic model of segregation for the combined effects of group III and V exchange processes during epitaxial growth and compare with experimental data from Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many commonly used force fields, such as the modified embedded atom model or Stillinger–Weber potentials, cannot capture bond-making and bond-breaking processes nor any associated phase change. The well-known Tersoff model is a “bond order”-based method and might be considered to offer a compromise in lieu of explicit bond-making and bond-breaking capability, but the limitations of this model have also become well-documented. A more flexible model, such as ReaxFF, which is explicitly designed to capture reactive systems, is certainly an alternative. In practice, ReaxFF requires extensive parametrization, and the result is highly specific to one particular reactive system. , If models for the system of study exists, then this is a viable option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many commonly used force fields, such as the modified embedded atom model or Stillinger–Weber potentials, cannot capture bond-making and bond-breaking processes nor any associated phase change. The well-known Tersoff model is a “bond order”-based method and might be considered to offer a compromise in lieu of explicit bond-making and bond-breaking capability, but the limitations of this model have also become well-documented. A more flexible model, such as ReaxFF, which is explicitly designed to capture reactive systems, is certainly an alternative. In practice, ReaxFF requires extensive parametrization, and the result is highly specific to one particular reactive system. , If models for the system of study exists, then this is a viable option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-known Tersoff model [3] is a "bond order" based method and might be considered to offer a compromise in lieu of explicit bond-making/breaking capability, but the limitations of this model have also become well-exposed. [4][5][6] Use of a more sophisticated model, such as ReaxFF, which is explicitly designed to capture reactive systems, could be used in theory to capture the reactive nature of a system. In practise, ReaxFF requires extensive parameterization, and the result is highly specific to one particular reactive system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%