1999
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.1999.9667269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Untrained Eye: How Languages for Software Specification Support Understanding in Untrained Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research on creating a shared understanding via collaborative conceptual modeling has focused on examining how conceptual models can act as boundary objects in collaborative settings and which requirements these models need to fulfill in order to be useable for actors in this context (Britton and Jones 1999;Genon et al 2011). As will be discussed in the following, findings presented in research on these topics can provide valuable insights in how the development of a shared understanding can be supported via modeling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further research on creating a shared understanding via collaborative conceptual modeling has focused on examining how conceptual models can act as boundary objects in collaborative settings and which requirements these models need to fulfill in order to be useable for actors in this context (Britton and Jones 1999;Genon et al 2011). As will be discussed in the following, findings presented in research on these topics can provide valuable insights in how the development of a shared understanding can be supported via modeling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements describe the coordinative aspects as well as the operative aspects of work and thus can be considered the minimal set of conceptual elements necessary to describe collaborative work (Fjuk et al 1997). When involving inexperienced modelers, it seems to be appropriate to limit the number of available modeling elements a priori to those appropriate for the intended modeling perspective and targeted outcome (Genon et al 2011;Britton and Jones 1999). The modeling language proposed here consequently consists of the following three modeling elements: WHO-elements representing actors, roles, or organizational entities (exact semantics depend on the level of abstraction individually chosen for modeling), WHAT-elements representing activities, and EXCHANGE-elements describing the exchange of information or artifacts among WHO-elements (exact semantics depend on designator for element).…”
Section: Structural Guidance Via Modeling Language Constructs and Laymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5). Britton and Jones [36] thereby define the properties of cognitive dimensions as properties of languages that contribute to ease of understanding of representations. Thus, for the requirement understandability, it is sufficient to examine the principles of cognitive effectiveness.…”
Section: Concept Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green [37] and Britton and Jones [36] present a dimension analysis of programming languages. The dimension analysis facilitates comparing dissimilar languages and also helps to identify the relationship between them.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in icons have heightened the need for the ease of communication (Britton & Jones, 1999;Bongshin et al, 2012). Communication systems based on icons originally introduced by Peirce (1931) have been reproduced in recent language work (e.g., Deacon, 1997).…”
Section: The Current Iconic Communication Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%