2015
DOI: 10.1177/0146167215591501 View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
|

Abstract: Do moral disagreements regarding specific issues (e.g., patriotism, chastity) reflect deep cognitive differences (i.e., distinct cognitive mechanisms) between liberals and conservatives? Dyadic morality suggests that the answer is "no." Despite moral diversity, we reveal that moral cognition--in both liberals and conservatives--is rooted in a harm-based template. A dyadic template suggests that harm should be central within moral cognition, an idea tested--and confirmed--through six specific hypotheses. Studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance
Select...
9
73
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals