The underlying challenges of coordination of chronic care across Europe

Abstract

An effective response to the rising burden of chronic disease requires a health system environment that is conducive to implementing structured, integrated approaches to chronic disease prevention and management. This study presents some of the reported factors hindering the successful implementation of chronic care approaches in six European healthcare systems and focuses on processes to address these. We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with key informants in The Netherlands and Spain, representing the decision-maker, payer, provider and/or patient perspective. Despite differences among the healthcare systems studied, a shared set of barriers emerged. These included: (i) a continued focus on complications management and a failure to integrate risk minimisation and disease prevention along the spectrum of care; (ii) care fragmentation acting as a barrier to better coordination; (iii) a mismatch between intent, at national level, to enhance coordination and integration, and ability at regional or local level to translate these ambitions into practice; and (iv) a lack of structures suitable to promote proactive engagement with patients in the management of their own condition. Findings suggest successful implementation of chronic care across Europe will require cross-disciplinary collaboration, raising the profile of general practitioners and nurses, designing care explicitly around the needs of the patient, and the political will to carry forward these chronic care measures.

Providers' Perspectives on Case Management of a Healthy Start Program: A Qualitative Study

“…As in previous studies [ 32 , 33 ], these supervisors and case managers recognized the benefits of using case management as a vehicle for overcoming system fragmentation and for facilitating optimal service delivery to women and their families, and sought to link clients to available services in a timely manner. They clearly also strove to meet the program rules, guidelines and timelines, and respond to the evolving operating environment through rapid demographic shifts and gentrification [ 30 , 31 ].…”

Redesigning care delivery with patient support personnel: Learning from accountable care organizations

“…Our respondents indicated that ACOs have put PSP in charge of care coordination and logistical help in various settings. 28 While the model in which multiple providers take care of the same patient is a problem that plagues health care in many countries, 29 PSP could connect disparate parts of the system while focusing on patients' needs. However, reaping the benefits of improved coordinated care may require physicians to relinquish some authority to PSP, and it is unclear whether physicians will embrace such change.…”

The chronic abyss and an electronic bridge

“…2 The authors emphasize cross-disciplinary collaboration and designing patient centric care, and the need for systemic wide support. 2…”

“…1 In a recent article in the International Journal of Care Coordination, it was concluded that barriers to improve care coordination for the chronically ill include: (a) a continued focus on complications management and a failure to integrate risk minimization and disease prevention along the spectrum of care; (b) care fragmentation acting as a barrier to better coordination; (c) a mismatch between intent, at national level, to enhance coordination and integration, and ability at regional or local level to translate these ambitions into practice; and (d) a lack of structures suitable to promote proactive engagement with patients in the management of their own condition. 2 The authors emphasize cross-disciplinary collaboration and designing patient centric care, and the need for systemic wide support. 2 In Australia, 3.3 million people suffer from general arthritis, of which about 450,000 are people with rheumatoid disease (including 5000 children), which is the most severe form of arthritis involving a lifelong painful chronic condition associated with very serious health consequences.…”

“…2 The authors emphasize cross-disciplinary collaboration and designing patient centric care, and the need for systemic wide support. 2 In Australia, 3.3 million people suffer from general arthritis, of which about 450,000 are people with rheumatoid disease (including 5000 children), which is the most severe form of arthritis involving a lifelong painful chronic condition associated with very serious health consequences. This represents about 2% of the population with the ratio of males to females being around 1-3 and there are over 9800 yearly admissions to hospital for this condition.…”